Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Florance v. Maillot, 22 La. Ann. 114.
-
Olsen v. Tung
155 So. 16
La. 1934
and in Fitzgerald v. Katzenstein & Wiener, 5 La.
-
Grand Lodge K. P. v. Thomson & Bros.
127 So. 32
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
In Florance vs. Maillot et al., , the extent of the use was not in dispute, and the only question at issue was that of determining the method of fixing the value of the common wall.
-
Fitzgerald v. Katzenstein & Wiener
5 La. App. 28
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
In the case of Florence vs. Maillot and Wood, , is on all fours with the case at bar.
-
Canal-Villere Realty Co. v. S. Gumble Realty & Securities Co.
1 La. App. 123
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
It will seem that he is liable.” Same word “use” in W. T. Davis vs. A. Grailhe, 14 La Ann. 338, and in Florence vs. Maillot, ; Graihle vs. Hown, 1 La.