Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fowler v. Roberts, 526 So. 2d 266.
-
Webster v. Ballard
961 So. 2d 13
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4 Cir.1988)(holding that where the plaintiff identified her medical bills at trial as proof of the cost of her treatment, such evidence was not hearsay, and that "[plaintiff's] testimony regarding her treatment, and not the bills, prove the fact of treatment"), (La.App.
-
King v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co.
782 So. 2d 1104
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
[4] Our conclusion regarding the inapplicability of this supplemental payment provision is distinguished from the conclusions reached in Martin v. Champion Insurance Company, 95-0030 (La.6/30/95), (La.App.
- Clark v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 716 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Clark v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 716 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-
Whiddon v. Hutchinson
668 So. 2d 1368
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Martin, 95-0030, 656 So.2d at 995; McLemore, 565 So.2d at 1037-38 ; -81 (La.App.
- Martin v. Champion Ins. Co. 656 So. 2d 991 La. 1995
- Tartar v. Hymes 656 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
-
Martin v. Champion Insurance Co.
649 So. 2d 20
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
App. 4th Cir.1989), writ denied, (La.App.
- Johnson v. Department of Public Safety 627 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- Kniepp v. City of Shreveport 609 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- Verdun v. STATE, DHHR 559 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Fowler v. Roberts 556 So. 2d 1 La. 1990
- Runnels v. Esteves 550 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- Russell v. Maryland Cas. Co. 544 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Guillory v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 542 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
-
Fowler v. Roberts
531 So. 2d 257
La. 1988
Prior report: La.App., .
-
Fowler v. Roberts
531 So. 2d 278
La. 1988
Prior report: La.App., .