Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vogts v. Schwegmann, 56 So. 2d 177.

19 citing documents.

Reed v. West Bros. of Eunice, L.A., Inc. 338 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
See Vogts v. Schwegmann [La.App.Orl., ] supra; Reid v. Monticello, [La.App., 1 Cir., ] supra; Williams v. Liberty Stores, 148 La.
Landry v. Hazelwood & Santillo, Inc. 330 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
697 , ; Vogts v. Schwegmann, La.App., .
Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 309 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Eaton v. General Accident Group 292 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
2d 627 ; Baturo v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., La.App., ; Norman v. Standard Supply & Hardware Co., Inc., La.App., ; Easterling v. J. A. Jones Construction Company, La.App., ; Smith v. W. Horace Williams Company, La.App., ; Vogts v. Schwegmann, La.App., ; Noble Drilling Corporation v. Donovan, D.C., 266 F.Supp.
Estrade v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. 286 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
(La.App.1952), we held that the passage of thirty or forty minutes was sufficient time in which to give a storekeeper or his employees constructive notice of the existence of a dangerous condition in a portion of his store which customers are invited to use.
White v. J. Weingarten, Inc. 270 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Dunn v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION 241 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
444 , ; and see La.App., ); Vogts v. Schwegmann, La.App., Orl., ; Lindsey v. Travelers Indemnity Company, La.App.
Lang v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 230 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
The presence of an extraneous substance or object on the floor or in a passageway of a (La.
Rideau v. National Food Stores of La., Inc. 230 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Hay v. SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY 224 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
See Vogts v. Schwegmann, [La.App.], .
Hawsey v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 211 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Lofton v. Travelers Insurance Company 208 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
See Vogts v. Schwegmann, La.App., (4th Cir.1952) in which 30 to 40 minutes was held to be sufficient time to give constructive notice of a hazard in an aisle.
Fisher v. Sears 196 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
See Vogt v. Schwegmann, La.App., (1952) wherein we expressed the opinion that passage of 30 or 40 minutes was sufficient time in which to give a storekeeper or Ms employees constructive notice of the existence of a dangerous condition in a portion of his store which customers are invited to use.
Barrere v. Commercial Union Insurance Group 195 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Robnett v. Great American Insurance Co. of NY 187 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
See, also, Dever v. George Theriot's, Inc., , La.App., 3d Cir. 1964; , La.App., 4th Cir. 1964 (writ refused); , La.App., Orleans 1952.
Snell v. Intercoastal Airways, Inc. 165 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
stify was Dr. Blaise Salatich, an orthopedic surgeon, whom Defendants sought to completely discredit because of the rejection of his testimony in the following cases: Norman v. Standard Supply and Hardware Co., La.App., ; Easterling v. J. A. Jones Construction Company, La.App., ; Smith v. W. Horace Williams Company, La.App., ; Vogts v. Schwegmann, La.App., .
Distinguished Kramer v. Etie 155 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
521 ; Reid v. Monticello, La.App., ; and Vogts v. Schwegmann, La.App., , which allowed recovery to a customer who tripped over an object in the aisle of a store.
Provost v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company 154 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
444 , ; and see La.App., ); Vogts v. Schwegmann, La.App.Orl., ; Lindsey v. Travelers Indemnity Company, La.App.
Lejeune v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNTY CO. 136 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
233 ; Vogts v. Schwegmann, La.App., ; Reid v. Monticello, La.App., ; Bowers v. Lumberman's Mutual, La.App., .