Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., 50 So. 2d 829.
-
Lacey v. Nettles
250 So. 2d 826
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
4th Cir. 1968, writ refused)
-
Moreau v. Corley
212 So. 2d 566
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
As the Court said in Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., : "When confronted with a stop sign erected by the proper officials of the city, in addition to being legally obliged to bring his vehicle to a complete stop, a motorist is held to the duty of appraising traffic conditions in the intersecting street, and of making certain that the way is clear for him to make a safe p
-
Earles v. Volentine
191 So. 2d 740
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
Orleans, 1951, ; Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Conn., La.
-
Courtault v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
169 So. 2d 592
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Whittington v. Gully, La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
-
Biggs v. Verbois
151 So. 2d 172
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Co., La.App.1946, ; Hooper v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Co., La.App.1951, ; Volz v. Fertel, La.App.1957, ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App.1956, ; Brown v. Checker Cab Co., supra; Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Ins.
-
Jenkins v. Brignac
146 So. 2d 649
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Co. v. *653 Copeland, La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Kirby v. Great American Indemnity Co., La.App., .
-
Hamilton v. Dalrymple
135 So. 2d 536
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
2d 753, 756 ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Lafont v. Nola Cabs, Inc., La.
-
Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company
135 So. 2d 77
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Orleans, 1951, ; Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Conn., La.App.
-
Briscoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
134 So. 2d 128
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Flowers v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, La.App., (1st Cir. 1949); Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Company, La.App., (1st Cir. 1950); Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Company, La.App., (Orl.App.
-
Hunter v. United Services Automobile Association
129 So. 2d 908
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
McCollister v. Gatti et al., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Glen Falls Ins.
-
Bickham v. Audubon Insurance Co.
130 So. 2d 60
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Co. of North America, La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
-
Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Jones
128 So. 2d 687
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
See also: Montalbano v. Hall, La.App., ; Dodd v. Bass, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Dowden v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., La.App., .
-
Lavigne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.
125 So. 2d 430
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
1951, ; Volz v. Fertel, La.App.
-
Gallioto v. Chisholm
126 So. 2d 63
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Lafont v. Nola Cabs, Inc., La.
-
Moore v. Shreveport Transit Company
115 So. 2d 218
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
See also: Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Hardware Mut.
-
Montalbano v. Hall
108 So. 2d 16
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ."
-
Insurance Co. of North America v. Gore
106 So. 2d 471
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
-
Volz v. Fertel
95 So. 2d 383
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
we said: “When confronted with a stop sign erected by the proper officials of the city, in addition to being legally obliged to bring his vehicle to a complete stop, a motorist is held to the duty of appraising traffic conditions in the intersecting street, and of making certain that the way is clear for him to
-
Audubon Insurance Co. v. Lavallis
95 So. 2d 747
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Company, La.App., .” The evidence, we think discloses Rosa Mae Rachal did not preempt' the intersection, for at the time she entered Overton Street her vehicle was in imminent danger of being struck by the Lavallis truck which was too close and being driven in a lawful manner.
-
Keith v. Royal Indemnity Company
90 So. 2d 534
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co., La.App., ; Broughton v. Touchstone, La.App., .
-
Rachow v. Ringwald
87 So. 2d 173
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
This implies that the driver, when crossing a right of way street, must exercise care in observing the cars on the right of way street so as to determine their speed, position, and manner of operation.” See also Hooper v. Toye Bros., Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; White v. Glass, La.App., .
-
Ehtor v. Parish
86 So. 2d 543
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Facio v. Bellone, La.App., ; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., .
-
Heindel v. Transcontinental Insurance Co. of Hartford, Conn.
82 So. 2d 491
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Hooper v. Toye *493 Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Boudreaux v. Moreau, La.App., .
-
Kohlmann v. City of New Orleans
79 So. 2d 400
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
# * * ” In Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , .831, we considered the effect of not stopping at a Stop sign, or of stopping and not looking and, not properly appraising the danger of the situation and said: “When confronted with a stop sign erected by the proper officials of the city, in addition to being legally obligated to bring his vehicle to a complete sto
-
Brown v. Gonzales
77 So. 2d 887
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Maloz v. N[ew] O[rleans] Public Service, Inc. [La.App.], ; Porter [for and on Behalf of Porter] v. De Boisblanc [La.App.], ; Hooper v. [Toye Bros.] Yellow Cab Co. [La.App.], ; Koob v. Coop.
-
White v. Glass
78 So. 2d 57
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
App.1951, ; McCollister v. Gatti, La.App.1953, .
-
Broughton v. Touchstone
72 So. 2d 552
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ".
-
Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Conn.
70 So. 2d 235
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
ted, clearly requires the interpretation of preemption to be the entrance of an intersection with the normal and reasonable opportunity and expectation of clearing such intersection without obstruction to the crossing thereof by other vehicles; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
- Maloz v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 65 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
-
McCollister v. Gatti
64 So. 2d 447
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
See: Glen Falls Insurance Company v. Copeland, La.App., 1946, ; Hopper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., 1951, .
-
Newton v. Ortego
51 So. 2d 149
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Thigpen v. Mangin, La.App., 46 So.