Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., 50 So. 2d 829.

31 citing documents.

  • Lacey v. Nettles 250 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    4th Cir. 1968, writ refused)
  • Moreau v. Corley 212 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    As the Court said in Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., : "When confronted with a stop sign erected by the proper officials of the city, in addition to being legally obliged to bring his vehicle to a complete stop, a motorist is held to the duty of appraising traffic conditions in the intersecting street, and of making certain that the way is clear for him to make a safe p
  • Earles v. Volentine 191 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
    Orleans, 1951, ; Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Conn., La.
  • Courtault v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 169 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    Whittington v. Gully, La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Biggs v. Verbois 151 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Co., La.App.1946, ; Hooper v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Co., La.App.1951, ; Volz v. Fertel, La.App.1957, ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App.1956, ; Brown v. Checker Cab Co., supra; Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Ins.
  • Jenkins v. Brignac 146 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Co. v. *653 Copeland, La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Kirby v. Great American Indemnity Co., La.App., .
  • Hamilton v. Dalrymple 135 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    2d 753, 756 ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Lafont v. Nola Cabs, Inc., La.
  • Potts v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company 135 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Orleans, 1951, ; Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Conn., La.App.
  • Briscoe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 134 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Flowers v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, La.App., (1st Cir. 1949); Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Company, La.App., (1st Cir. 1950); Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Company, La.App., (Orl.App.
  • Hunter v. United Services Automobile Association 129 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    McCollister v. Gatti et al., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Glen Falls Ins.
  • Bickham v. Audubon Insurance Co. 130 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Co. of North America, La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Jones 128 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    See also: Montalbano v. Hall, La.App., ; Dodd v. Bass, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Dowden v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., La.App., .
  • Lavigne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 125 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    1951, ; Volz v. Fertel, La.App.
  • Gallioto v. Chisholm 126 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
    App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Lafont v. Nola Cabs, Inc., La.
  • Moore v. Shreveport Transit Company 115 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    See also: Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Hardware Mut.
  • Montalbano v. Hall 108 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ."
  • Insurance Co. of North America v. Gore 106 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Volz v. Fertel 95 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    we said: “When confronted with a stop sign erected by the proper officials of the city, in addition to being legally obliged to bring his vehicle to a complete stop, a motorist is held to the duty of appraising traffic conditions in the intersecting street, and of making certain that the way is clear for him to
  • Audubon Insurance Co. v. Lavallis 95 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Butler v. O’Neal, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Company, La.App., .” The evidence, we think discloses Rosa Mae Rachal did not preempt' the intersection, for at the time she entered Overton Street her vehicle was in imminent danger of being struck by the Lavallis truck which was too close and being driven in a lawful manner.
  • Keith v. Royal Indemnity Company 90 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co., La.App., ; Broughton v. Touchstone, La.App., .
  • Rachow v. Ringwald 87 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    This implies that the driver, when crossing a right of way street, must exercise care in observing the cars on the right of way street so as to determine their speed, position, and manner of operation.” See also Hooper v. Toye Bros., Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; White v. Glass, La.App., .
  • Ehtor v. Parish 86 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Facio v. Bellone, La.App., ; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., .
  • Heindel v. Transcontinental Insurance Co. of Hartford, Conn. 82 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Hooper v. Toye *493 Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Boudreaux v. Moreau, La.App., .
  • Kohlmann v. City of New Orleans 79 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    # * * ” In Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , .831, we considered the effect of not stopping at a Stop sign, or of stopping and not looking and, not properly appraising the danger of the situation and said: “When confronted with a stop sign erected by the proper officials of the city, in addition to being legally obligated to bring his vehicle to a complete sto
  • Brown v. Gonzales 77 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Maloz v. N[ew] O[rleans] Public Service, Inc. [La.App.], ; Porter [for and on Behalf of Porter] v. De Boisblanc [La.App.], ; Hooper v. [Toye Bros.] Yellow Cab Co. [La.App.], ; Koob v. Coop.
  • White v. Glass 78 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    App.1951, ; McCollister v. Gatti, La.App.1953, .
  • Broughton v. Touchstone 72 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ".
  • Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Conn. 70 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    ted, clearly requires the interpretation of preemption to be the entrance of an intersection with the normal and reasonable opportunity and expectation of clearing such intersection without obstruction to the crossing thereof by other vehicles; Butler v. O'Neal, La.App., ; Aucoin v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., ; Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Maloz v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 65 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
  • McCollister v. Gatti 64 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    See: Glen Falls Insurance Company v. Copeland, La.App., 1946, ; Hopper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., 1951, .
  • Newton v. Ortego 51 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    Hooper v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Thigpen v. Mangin, La.App., 46 So.