Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Middleton v. Middleton, 526 So. 2d 859.

17 citing documents.

Succession of Sigur v. Henritzy 126 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1 Frank L. Maraist and Harry T. Lemmon, LOUISIANA CIVIL LAW TREATISE: CIVIL PROCEDURE § 10.4 (1999) ( (La.App.
Willie J. Zeno, Sr. v. Warren A. Perrin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“No ‘definite action’ by a plaintiff or inaction by a defendant after accrual of the [three-]year period can be construed as a waiver of abandonment by the defendant, although a defendant by ‘definite action’ may waive the abandonment.” Middleton [v. Middleton, (La.App.
Zeno v. Perrin 7 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Middleton [v. Middleton, (La.App.
Satterthwaite v. Byais 943 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Bell v. Kreider 890 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In Re Succession of Wright 855 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Maraist Lemmon, supra, § 10.4 at 243; (La.App.
Moore v. Eden Gardens Nursing Center 850 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Gallagher v. Cook, 34,158 (La.App.2d Cir.12/15/00), ; (La.App.
Mouton v. Patch 819 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Clark v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 785 So. 2d 779 La. 2001
Gallagher v. Cook 775 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Porter v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co. 771 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Clark v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 769 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Seagrave v. Dean 739 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
3d Cir.1992)(filing an answer and reconventional demand after five-year abandonment period constituted waiver); (La.App.
Harris v. Harris 687 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Production Specialties, Inc. v. Century Oil Tool Co., Inc. 602 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Teague v. Scott 597 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
For examples of actions that constitute such waiver, (La.App.
State, Dept. of Hwys. v. Enserch Corp. 559 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990