Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Meyer v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., 61 So. 2d 901.

16 citing documents.

National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Harrington 854 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Hennegan v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Co. 837 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Co., a patient injured during an operation sued the oral surgeon and the anesthesiologist, and in fact the case proceeded on a res ipsa basis, with both defendants exculpating themselves.
Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 350 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Paul, Minnesota, (La.App.
Wells v. Woman's Hospital Foundation 286 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., (Orl.La.
Buras v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 263 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
McCann v. Baton Rouge General Hospital 258 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., (La.App.
Herbert v. Travelers Indemnity Company 239 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
Moak v. Link-Belt Company 229 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
LeMay v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. 228 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., : “We have no doubt at all that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur has no application where, in the ordinary suit against a physician, a surgeon, or a dentist for malpractice, all that is shown is that the desired result was not accomplished.
Johnson v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company 219 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Paul, Minnesota, La.App., (Orleans App., 1952), affirmed at 225 La.
Britt v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 205 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
results, but is based on the charge that, during the rendering of the professional services, there occurred some untoward event, or some omission or act from which there resulted something not ordinarily found to result during such treatment or operation, the physician, or the surgeon, or the dentist may be required to show that such unusual occurrence did not result from negligence on his part.” (1952).
Herbert v. Travelers Indemnity Company 193 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Co., (1952): "We have no doubt at all that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur has no application where, in the ordinary suit against a physician, a surgeon, or a dentist for malpractice, all that is shown is that the desired result was not accomplished.
Dyess v. Caraway 190 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
618 , (1953); La.App., (Orl.Cir.
Murphy Corporation v. Petrochem Maintenance, Inc. 180 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., La.App., and Arrington v. Hearin Tank Lines, La.
Whyte v. American Motorists Insurance Co. 122 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Andrepont v. Ochsner 84 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Paul, Minn., La.App., , decided by us, which was a malpractice action brought by a patient whose tooth became dislodged and found its way into one of her lungs during the process of the administration of an anesthetic prior to the extraction of her teeth.