Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., 535 So. 2d 1119.
-
Dwayne Olivier v. City of Eunice
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Section 1212 was enacted in 1989 to provide the offset sought by employers but rejected in Bryant, Theriot, Woolsey, and McKenzie
-
Olivier v. City of Eunice
92 So. 3d 630
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir.1986); Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
- Dufrene v. VIDEO CO-OP, LA. WORKERS'COMP. 843 So. 2d 1066 La. 2003
- Atwood v. Ewing Timber, Inc. 774 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
- Baker v. Libbey Glass, Inc. 759 So. 2d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
-
Bennett v. Rodeway Inn
734 So. 2d 129
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1 Cir. 10/6/95), , writ denied, 96-0440 (La.4/8/96), ; Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Watson v. Funderburk
720 So. 2d 808
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Bryant v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.App.
-
Spencer v. Gaylord Container Corp.
693 So. 2d 818
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
1st Cir. 10/6/95) , writ denied, 96-0440 (La.4/8/96) ; (La.
-
Watkins v. Asphalt Associates, Inc.
685 So. 2d 393
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Washington v. Lyons Specialty Co.
683 So. 2d 367
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
5th Cir.1990); Woolsey v. Cotton Brothers Bakery Co., Inc., writ denied
-
Taylor v. Garrett
682 So. 2d 831
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Principal Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Progressive United Corp.
674 So. 2d 1073
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
See, for example, Bryant v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.App.
- Hickman v. City of New Orleans 666 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- Hollingsworth v. E. Baton Rouge Parish Sch. Bd. 666 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
Prevost v. Jobbers Oil Transport Co.
665 So. 2d 400
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
23:1221(3)(d); Woolsey v. Cotton Brothers Bakery Co., Inc., writ denied, (La.
-
Roszell v. Skip Converse Interior Co.
649 So. 2d 1161
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Woolley v. CAS Refining, Inc.
651 So. 2d 860
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Strange v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.
649 So. 2d 69
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
In Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Vincent v. Justiss Oil Co., Inc.
649 So. 2d 508
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Brown v. Vernon Sawyer, Inc.
645 So. 2d 260
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
2d Cir.1989); Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Rothell v. City of Shreveport
626 So. 2d 763
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
2d Cir.1991); Woolsey v. Cotton Brothers Bakery Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Thomas v. Ramsey's Trailways, Inc.
618 So. 2d 667
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
In Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., writ denied, this court stated that a claim is reasonably controverted if the employer has sufficient factual and medical information to reasonably counter the information presented by the claimant.
-
Martin v. Riverview Medical Center
618 So. 2d 1014
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
See Woolsey v. Cotton Brothers Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Canady v. Pynes Chrysler, Inc.
617 So. 2d 566
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Ferguson v. HDE, Inc., Adams v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
- Hinton v. Scott Hydraulics, Inc. 614 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
-
Durand on Behalf of Durand v. NAT. TEA CO.
607 So. 2d 573
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
App. 3rd Cir.1987) and Woolsey v. Cotton Brothers Bakery Co., Inc., -1128 (La.App.
-
Levatino v. Domengeaux and Wright, PLC
593 So. 2d 721
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
In Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Spinks v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RES.
591 So. 2d 423
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
1972); Adams v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
McKenzie v. City of Bossier City
585 So. 2d 1229
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
In addition to the lack of evidence presented by the defendant, we note that in Woolsey v. Cotton Brothers Bakery Company, Inc., (La.App.
- Warren v. H & W Steel Erectors Inc. 569 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Tucker v. Pony Exp. Courier Corp.
562 So. 2d 897
La. 1990
1972); Adams v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Holmes v. International Paper Co.
559 So. 2d 970
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc.
-
Davis v. Townley
552 So. 2d 518
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
2d Cir.1985); Woolsey v. Cotton Bros. Bakery Co., Inc., (La.App.