Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, 65 So. 2d 397.

14 citing documents.

Tyler v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. 289 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
9 ; Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, La.App., ; Gallow v. Wilson P. Abraham Construction Company, La.App., .
Lavergne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 171 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
2 Cir., ; Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, La.App.Orl., ; Viator v. Hub City Contractors, Inc., La.App.
Anderson v. Continental Can Company 141 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
1953) ; Ernest v. Martin Timber Co. (La.App.
Murry v. Southern Pulpwood Insurance Company 136 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
App. Orl., ; Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, La.App.Orl., .
Ernest v. Martin Timber Co. 124 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
1 Cir., 1951, ; Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, La.App.Orl.1953, .
Reed v. Calcasieu Paper Co. 93 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
1 Cir., ; Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, La.App., , hold that where an employee due to the accidental injury is unable to perform substantially the duties formerly performed by him during the employment in which injured, he is totally disabled, despite his ability to earn a living doing other and lighter or less laborious, or less (or more) skilled duties.” Cummings
Roy v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance 87 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Cases cited to us by defendant disallowing extra pay as a basis for compensation such as Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, La.App., , Reynolds v. Forcum-James Co., La.App., 162 So.
Parker v. Armour & Co. 86 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
not contemplate, that a worker, in order to make a living, must work in pain * * In the case referred to hereinabove, while it is true that the injured employee was one designated as a “skilled laborer”, we think that the rationale expressed in the rule enunciated therein, applies with equal facility to a “common laborer.” In this connection in Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, La.App.1953, , we expressed our opinion thereof as follows: “ * * * even in the case of a common laborer as disti
Welch v. Newport Industries 86 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
1 Cir., ; Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, La.App., .
Radecker v. Blue Plate Foods, Inc. 80 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
In the relatively recent case of Scott v. Fulton Bag and Cotton Mills, La.App.1953, , we had occasion to dis *879 cuss this very problem posed by plaintiff’s contention and we asserted: “We think that the weekly wage was correctly based on a five-day week.
Senegal v. Travelers Insurance Co. 79 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Counsel for plaintiff places great reliance on the case of Scott v. Fulton Bag and Cotton Mills, La.App., .
Cummings v. Albert 86 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
App., , hold that where an employee due to the accidental injury is unable to perform substantially the duties formerly performed by him during the employment in which injured, he is totally disabled, despite his ability to earn a living doing other and lighter or less laborious, or less (or more) skilled duties.
Carrington v. Consolidated Underwriters 80 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
611 , .” This rule was followed by the Orleans Court of Appeal in Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, La.App., .
Loflin v. Erectors & Riggers, Inc. 68 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Co., ; Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, La.App., ; and Rabitaille v. Steel Tank Construction Company, La.App., , cited in the brief of ap-pellee 'and find that they cannot support the judgment of the Trial Court in this case, because the injury in each one was more extensive, or the work performed following the injury was dissimilar in character under t