Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Snearl v. Mercer, 780 So. 2d 563.

40 citing documents.

Brandy Harry v. ABC Insurance Company, XYZ Insurance Company, Shell Chemical LP La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
App. 1 Cir. 2/ 16/ 01), writs denied, 2001- 1319 ( La.
Lisa Kay Kunstman Pirosko v. Joseph J. Pirosko, III La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
App. 1St Cir. 2116101), writs denied, 2001- 1319 and 2001- 1320 ( La.
Craig Aucoin v. Sheriff Jerry J. Larpenter, ex officio as the Terrebonne Parish Sheriff; Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
App. 1 Cir. 2/ 16/ 01), writ denied, 2001- 1319 ( La.
Earnest Joseph v. Lt. Darren Moody and State of Louisiana through Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
App. 1St Cir. 2/ 16/ 01), writs denied, 2001- 1319 ( La.
Davis v. Nola Home Construction, L.L.C. 222 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 & 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), .
Noyel v. City of St. Gabriel 202 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1 Cir. 2/16/01) , , writ denied, 2001-1319 (La.6/22/01), , and writ denied, 2001-1320 (La.6/22/01), .
Rhodus v. Lewis 193 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1 Cir. 2/16/01) , , writs denied, 01-1319, 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), , 801; City Nat.
Zacher v. Harrah's New Orleans Management Co. 136 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Sacco v. Paxton 133 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Cahn v. Cox 101 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Franatovich v. St. Bernard Parish Government 88 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1 Cir. 2/16/01) , (35% fault was assessed to a driver who, due to momentary inattentiveness, lost control of his dump truck, which fell 30 feet off of the highway).
Watters v. Department of Social Services 102 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Walker v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 61 So. 3d 699 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
1 Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 and 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), and 801).
Thongsavanh v. Schexnayder 40 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 (La.6/22/01), and 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), .
Larry Burns v. Interstate Brands Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
1st Cir.2/16/01), writs denied, 01-1319 & 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), &
Burns v. Interstate Brands Corp. 30 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 & 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), & .
Crawford v. DIAMOND B. CONSTRUCTION, LLC 17 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319, 01-1320, (La.
Watters v. Department of Social Services 15 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Harris v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 997 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, *867 01-1319, 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), ,801.
Harris v. Delta Development Partnership 994 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 (La.6/22/01), and 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), .
Jenkins v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 993 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 (La.6/22/01), and 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), .
Jenkins v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 993 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 (La.6/22/01), and 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), .
Tassin v. Bendel 989 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Clarkston v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 and 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), and 801.
Clarkston v. LA. FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. CO. 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 and 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), and 801.
Forbes v. Cockerham 985 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, XXXX-XXXX and XXXX-XXXX (La.6/22/01), and , demonstrates that the jury far exceeded any measure or reasonableness because its award exceeded the "highest of the high" awards made to claimants who were more seriously injured than Joshua.
Hager v. STATE, EX REL. DOTD 978 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 (La.6/22/01), and 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), .
Hager v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 978 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 (La.6/22/01), and 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), .
Rideau v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 970 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 and 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), and 801.
Burrell v. Williams 938 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1 Cir. 2/16/01) , , writs denied, 01-1319, 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), , 801.
Manno v. Gutierrez 934 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 (La.6/22/01), and 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), .
State v. LeBlanc 928 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1st Cir.2/16/01), ; (La.App.
Zulli v. Coregis Ins. Co. 910 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 2/16/01) , , writs denied, 01-1319, 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), .
Rathey v. Priority EMS, Inc. 894 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 2/16/01), (applying Gauthier approach to reallocate fault of co-employee).
Barham & Arceneaux v. Kozak 874 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 01-1319 & 01-1320 (La.6/22/01), & .
Wingfield v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 2/16/01), , writs denied, 2001-1319, 2001-1320 (La.6/22/01), , 801.
Wingfield v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. 835 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 2/16/01), , writs denied, XXXX-XXXX, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/22/01), , 801.
Hebert v. ANCO Insulation, Inc. 835 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Winkler v. Coastal Towing, LLC 823 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1st Cir.2/16/2001), , writs denied, XXXX-XXXX, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/22/2001), and 801 and Ventura v. Cox Cable Jefferson Parish, Inc., (La.App.
Family Resource Group, Inc. v. Louisiana Parent Magazine 818 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1st Cir.2/16/01), , writs denied, 2001-1319, 2001-1320 (La.6/22/01), , 801/ Based upon the arguments presented by defendants in support of their exception, we conclude that defendants are in fact asserting that plaintiffs have abandoned their appeal, rather than truly arguing that the petition fails to state a cause