Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lemaire v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 793 So. 2d 336.
-
Lester v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
120 So. 3d 767
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1 Cir. 6/22/01) , (granting damages for the fear of cancer to an environmental cleanup worker who was exposed to a known cancer-causing agent after he was twice hospitalized, developed proteinuria, back and kidney problems and insomnia).
-
DOMINIO v. Folger Coffee Co.
32 So. 3d 955
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1 Cir. 6/22/01) , , that the question of statutory employer status is a legal one for the trial judge, not the jury to decide.
-
McGee v. AC AND S, INC.
933 So. 2d 770
La. 2006
1 Cir. 6/22/01) , (upholding a general damage award that included a separate award for loss of enjoyment of life, stating that "[t]his court has previously held that loss of enjoyment of life is a separate item of damages and independent from physical pain and suffering"); Matos v. Clarendon Nat'l Ins.
-
Wade v. TEACHERS'RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF LOUISIANA
938 So. 2d 103
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1 Cir. 6/22/01) , , writ denied, 01-2153 (La.11/16/01), .
-
Moory v. Allstate Ins. Co.
906 So. 2d 474
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
App. 1st Cir.6/22/01), , writ denied, 01-2153 (La.11/16/01), .
- Edward Trent, Jr. v. Ppg Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Trent v. PPG Industries, Inc. 865 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Ivy v. V's Holding Co.
859 So. 2d 22
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
App. 1 Cir. 6/22/01), , writ denied, 2001-2153 (La.11/16/01), .
-
Brewton v. Underwriters Ins. Co.
848 So. 2d 586
La. 2003
1 Cir. 6/22/01) , , writ denied, 01-2153
- Burdette v. Drushell 837 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
Matos v. Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co.
808 So. 2d 841
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
1 Cir. 6/22/01), , writ denied, 2001-2153 (La.11/16/01), .
-
Emery v. Owens-Corporation
813 So. 2d 441
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1st Cir. 6/22/2001), , another panel of this court concluded the determination of whether an accident is work-related, in the context of statutory employer status, is a question of law for the court to decide.
- Maddox v. Steel 814 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001