1999-C-3446 Precedential Processed

Capitol House Preservation Company, LLC v. PERRYMAN CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed February 11, 2000 · 754 So. 2d 937

Also decided on this docket: La., February 11, 2000 754 So. 2d 937

Cited by

The Rapides Parish School Board v. Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Bihm v. Deca Systems, Inc. 226 So. 3d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State ex rel. C.S. 49 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Capitol House Preservation Co. v. Perryman Consultants, Inc. 47 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Ristroph v. Public Facilities Authority 943 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Glod v. Baker 899 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D. v. W. Gregory Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Capital House v. Perryman Consultants 889 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Capitol House Preserv. v. Perryman Consult 836 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Parish of Caddo v. Durham 817 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002

Opinion text

754 So.2d 937 (2000) CAPITOL HOUSE PRESERVATION COMPANY, L.L.C. v. PERRYMAN CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED; Mr. M. Ray Perryman; XYZ Insurance Company; and TUV Insurance Company. No. 1999-C-3446. Supreme Court of Louisiana. February 11, 2000. *938 Denied. VICTORY, J., not on panel; LEMMON, J., concurs, not necessarily agreeing that the period of limitation in La.Rev.Stat. 51:1409 E is peremptive, especially since the Legislative expressly used the word "prescription" and nothing indicates an intent or a necessity for peremptive classification.