Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lassere v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HOSP., OFFICE OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 808 So. 2d 513.
-
Denise Garibaldi, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Children Fallyn Jackson and Jayla Jackson v. State Farm …
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 1 Cir. 3/28/01), ).
-
Thomas Jablonski and Madonna Jablonski v. Capital Pools, L.L.C.
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
App. 1 Cir. 3/ 28/ 01), - 15 ( where counsel for the plaintiff appeared at the hearing, one day after being served, and objected to the hearing due to the lack of adequate notice).
- Dehart v. Jones 269 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Allen Dehart v. Bruce A. Jones, M. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-
Gilley v. Gilley Enterprises, Inc.
222 So. 3d 885
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
1 Cir. 3/28/01) , ; Macaluso v. Macaluso, supra.
- Jackson v. FedEx Corporated Services, Inc. 165 So. 3d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- Debra Gail Theriot Aucoin Fleming v. James Bailey Fleming La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
- Flemming v. Flemming 114 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
- Roman v. LRASIF Claims Management 81 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
Miller v. Crescent City Health Care Center
78 So. 3d 219
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1 Cir. 8/28/01), , (“[t]he strength of an opponent’s case on the merits does not outweigh the procedural protections afforded to the opponent of summary judgment.”) Based on our finding that the plaintiff did not receive proper notice of the hearing held on August 1, 2008, we hereby vacate the trial court judgment granting summar
-
Environmental Operators, L.L.C. v. NATCO, Inc.
7 So. 3d 1232
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1st Cir.03/28/01), ], supra; Bell, supra.
- City of Baton Rouge v. Am. Home Assur. Co. 991 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- Terrance Batiste v. Jose R. Gutierrez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Batiste v. Gutierrez 944 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Theodore Magnon, Sr. v. Charlene Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Magnon v. Miller 939 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Johnson v. STATE DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES 943 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
-
Home Depot v. State ex rel. Worker's Compensation Second Injury Board
934 So. 2d 125
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1 Cir. 3/28/01), , this Court stated the time limitation set forth in article 966 D is mandatory.
-
Bell v. Gold Rush Casino
893 So. 2d 969
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 3/28/01) , ; Bell v. Uniroyal, Inc., 96-2838 (La.App.
-
Reginald James Bell v. the Gold Rush Casino and Om Operating, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 3/28/01), Bell v. Uniroyal, Inc., 96-2838 (La.App.
-
Sunset Realty, Inc. v. Antonini
836 So. 2d 1173
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
1st Cir.3/28/01), , is misplaced.