Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Matos v. Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co., 808 So. 2d 841.

21 citing documents.

Antonette Smith individually and on behalf of minors, Taniyah Daniel, Tevin Daniel, Jr., and Trinity Smith v. GoAuto … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
App. 1 Cir. 2/15/02), wherein this court affirmed a general damage award of $265,000.00 to a 26-year-old plaintiff who was rear-ended by a large truck pulling a flatbed trailer and had suffered a herniated disc, disc protrusion, and disc bulges as a result and who had undergone one surgery and intended to undergo another.
McBride v. Lichtenstein 260 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1 Cir. 2/15/02), , 848, described the difference between pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life as follows: The same injuries may affect people differently.
Schexnayder v. Bridges 190 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Pennison v. Carrol 167 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Travis v. Spitale's Bar, Inc. 122 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1 Cir. 02/15/02) , ; Rickerson v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.
Eunice M. Guidry v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Guidry v. Allstate Insurance Co. 83 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Cotton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 65 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 1 Cir. 2/15/02), -49 .
Norma Jean Hardy and Jonathan David Hardy v. Gene M. Augustine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Co., 00-2814, p. 9 (La App. 1 Cir. 2/15/02), described the difference between pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life as follows: The same injuries may affect people differently.
Hardy v. Augustine 55 So. 3d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 1 Cir. 2/15/02), , described the difference between pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life as follows: The same injuries may affect people differently.
Amy Brossett v. Melody Howard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Brossett v. Howard 998 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
McGee v. AC AND S, INC. 933 So. 2d 770 La. 2006
Co., 00-2814, p. 9 (La App. 1 Cir. 2/15/02), , described the difference between pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life as follows: The same injuries may affect people differently.
Stephen P. Basco, Et Ux. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 2/15/02), Simms v. Progressive Ins.
Basco v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 909 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
1 Cir. 2/15/02) , ; Simms v. Progressive Ins.
Poche v. Allstate Ins. Co. 900 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
1st Cir.2/15/02), for a summation of the law in the Circuits through 2002.]
Simms v. Progressive Ins. Co. 883 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
1st Cir.2/15/02), , for a plaintiff in the prime of his life whose disabling back injuries deprived him of enjoying activities with his young child and foreclosed his participation in outdoors recreational activities.
Ford v. Bazile 871 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Levy v. BAYOU INDUS. MAINTENANCE SERVICES 855 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1st Cir.2/15/02), -848 .
Oliver v. Cal Dive Intern., Inc. 844 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
LeBleu v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 824 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
NOTES [1] As pointed out in Matos v. Clarendon National Insurance Co., 00-2814 (La.App 1 Cir. 2/15/02); , only the fourth circuit has held that it is erroneous to award separate damages for loss of enjoyment of life.