Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 788 So. 2d 1140.

26 citing documents.

Ike Spears v. William W. Hall La. 2026
5/15/01), (quoting Succession of Wallace, 574 So.
Frank Miller (Jonathan Miller-Deceased) v. Rayville Manufacturing La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
05/15/01), City of Baton Rouge v. Stauffer Chem.
Seale & Ross, P.L.C. v. Nedra Holder La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Edwin K. Hunter, Apc v. Thomas Glynn Blazier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/15/01), (neither the defendant attorney nor the law firm that employed him violated the Rules of Professional Conduct by requiring the plaintiff client to pay interest on loans by a third party for the client’s living expenses in accordance with the retainer agreement signed by the client); and Corbello v. Iowa Prod.
Whitney Bank v. Nogg, L.L.C. 194 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 2000-0414 (La.5/15/01), .
Skannal v. Jones Odom Davis & Politz, L.L.P. 124 So. 3d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 00-0414 (La.5/15/01), .
Hodges v. Reasonover 103 So. 3d 1069 La. 2012
Co., 00-414 (La.5/15/01), -8 (citations omitted).
MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co. 74 So. 3d 1173 La. 2011
Co., 00-0414 (La.5/15/01), , 1149 n. 21.
FIA Card Services, N.A. v. Weaver 62 So. 3d 709 La. 2011
Co., 00-414 (La.5/15/01), , 1149 n. 21.
Willie J. Zeno, Sr. v. Charles J. Foret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
See also, Chittenden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 00-0414, p. 10 (La.5/15/01)
Cunard Line Limited Co. v. Datrex Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
See RPC 1.5; Leenerts Farms, Inc., and Chittenden
Cunard Line Ltd. v. Datrex, Inc. 26 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 00-0414 (La.5/15/01)], .
In Re Fenasci 21 So. 3d 934 La. 2009
Co., 00-0414 (La.5/15/01), : |7In Edwins , a disciplinary proceeding against an attorney, we addressed, inter alia, the propriety of an attorney advancing funds to his client in violation of Disciplinary Rule 5-103(B).
In Re Warner 21 So. 3d 218 La. 2009
Co., 00-6414 (La.5/15/01), ; State v. Woodville, 161 La.
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP 950 So. 2d 641 La. 2007
See also, Chittenden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 00-0414, p. 10 (La.5/15/01), .
Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell v. Tommie Mack Granger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
5/15/01), -48 (footnote omitted).
Gold v. Granger 947 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
5/15/01), -48 (footnote omitted).
Chittenden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 872 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., 00-0414 (La.5/15/01), , the Court affirmed our decision, and concluded that Carimi did not violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell v. Granger 870 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., 00-0414 (La.5/15/01), .
Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell v. Tommie Mack Granger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Criticized Brian T. Shields, Et Ux v. Baker Hughes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Criticized Shields v. Baker Hughes, Inc. 866 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., 00-414 (La.5/15/01), .
Walker, Tooke & Lyons, LLP v. Sapp 862 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Co., 00-414 (La.5/15/01), .
Simmons v. Chambliss 852 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Despite the unequivocal wording of this rule, which would appear to preclude Bruscato's advancement of car rental expenses, the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized in Chittenden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 00-0414 (La.5/15/01), , that the "current practice of law in our State follows the Edwins policy of allowing an attorney to advance funds under the constraints enunciated in Edwins.
In re Laudumiey 849 So. 2d 515 La. 2003
Co., 00-0414 (La.5/15/01), ; In re: Bar Exam Class Action, 99-2880 (La.2/18/00), ; (La.
Schultz v. Hill 840 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See Chittenden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 15-17 (La.5/15/01), -52 .