DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 782 So. 2d 606.

154 citing documents.

  • Eunice M. Guidry v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
  • Guidry v. Allstate Insurance Co. 83 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), , reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
  • Barbe v. American Sugar Refining, Inc. 83 So. 3d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 2000-1372, 2000-1387, 2000-1440, p. 7 (La.3/23/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the elements necessary to prove a negligence claim, as follows: Under Louisiana jurisprudence, most negligence cases are resolved by employing a duty/risk analysis.
  • McGlothlin v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital 65 So. 3d 1218 La. 2011
    Guillory , 09-0075 at p. 14, 16 So.3d at 1116 -17 (quoting Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), ).
  • Carl Jones, Sr. v. Centerpoint Energy Entex La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3/23/01), (footnote omitted).
  • Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex 66 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    “Where there are concurrent causes of an accident, the proper inquiry is whether the conduct in question was a substantial factor in bringing about the accident.” Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440, p. 8 (La.3/23/01), (footnote omitted).
  • Munch v. Backer 63 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 2000-1372, p. 8 (La.3/23/01), .
  • Nolan v. Mabray 51 So. 3d 665 La. 2010
    See e.g., Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01) ; Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94), .
  • Guillot v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. 50 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    (quoting Guillory , 09-0075 at p. 14, 16 So.3d at 1116-17; Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), ).
  • Barbara Raymond v. Government Employees Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds ).
  • Raymond v. Government Employees Insurance 40 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), , reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
  • Dupre & Son Floor Covering, Inc. v. City of Iota La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3/23/01), (superseded by statute on other grounds).
  • Dupre & Son Floor Covering, Inc. v. City of Iota 36 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    App. 1 Cir. 12/28/99), , affd, 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), (superseded by statute on other grounds).
  • Iles v. Ogden 37 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440, p. 10 (La.3/23/01), -13 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
  • Scott Ferguson v. Loewer Powersports & Equipment La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), reh'g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds ).
  • Ferguson v. LOEWER POWERSPORTS & EQUIPMENT 33 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), , reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
  • Menard v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 31 So. 3d 996 La. 2010
    Guillory, 09-0075 at p. 14, 16 So.3d at 1116-17 (quoting Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), ).
  • John Terrell Fruge v. Onob, Inc. D/B/A Century 21 Mike D. Bono & Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Carleen Willis v. Rapides Parish Communications District A/K/A 911" " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Fruge v. ONOB, INC. 32 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), .
  • Willis v. RAPIDES PARISH COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT 30 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Savage v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 33 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), , reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
  • Flowers v. Entergy Corporation 30 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Perkins v. Entergy Corporation, 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440, p. 7 (La.3/23/01), ; (La.
  • State v. Williams 28 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), 613 , reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (,superseded by statute on other grounds).
  • Dennis v. Wiley 22 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), -612 .
  • Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), , reh’g denied, 4/27/01 () (superseded by statute on other grounds).
  • Watters v. Department of Social Services 15 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372, p. 7 (La.3/23/01); .
  • Allums v. Parish of Lincoln 15 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    In Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372, 1387, 1440 (La.3/23/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court made the following observation concerning the substantial factor test: This court has made several different inquiries when applying the substantial factor test.
  • Banister v. Day 13 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), .
  • Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. 16 So. 3d 1065 La. 2009
    1 Cir. 12/28/99) , , affirmed, 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), .
  • Millard P. Dumesnil, III v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Perkins v. Entergy Corporation, 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440, p. 7 (La.3/23/01), on reh’g, 556 So.2d at 13 (La.1990); Fleniken v. Entergy Corporation, 00-1824 (La.App.
  • Dumesnil v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. 2 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Perkins v. Entergy Corporation, 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440, p. 7 (La.3/23/01), ; on reh’g, 556 So.2d [1] at 13 (La.1990); Fleniken v. Entergy Corporation, 00-1824 (La.App.
  • Robertson v. Frank's Super Value Foods, Inc. 7 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), ; Longwell, 07-259 at 9, 970 So.2d at 1105 .
  • Rayeanne Owens v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Stall v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 995 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., XXXX-XXXX, XXXX-XXXX, XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.3/23/01), .
  • Moss v. State 993 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    When there are concurrent causes of an accident, which nevertheless would have occurred in the absence of one of the causes, the proper inquiry is whether the conduct under | ^consideration was a substantial factor in bringing about the accident Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), ; McCain v. Howell, 06-1830 (La.App.
  • Talton v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 981 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372, p. 7 (La.3/23/01), , the Court set forth the necessary elements to prove negligence: Under Louisiana jurisprudence, most negligence cases are resolved by employing a duty/risk analysis.
  • Longwell v. JEFFERSON PAR. HOSP. SER. DIST. 970 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    [12] Perkins v. Entergy Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.3/23/01), .
  • Longwell v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 1 970 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 2000-1372 (La.3/23/01), .
  • McCain v. Howell 971 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.3/23/01), .
  • Andrea S. Pannell v. Encompass Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3/23/01), (citing Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co. Inc., 96-1932 (La.
  • Pannell v. Encompass Insurance Co. 956 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440 (La.3/23/01), (citing Boykin v. Louisiana Transit Co. Inc., 96-1932 (La.3/4/98), ; Jones v. Hawkins, 98-1259, 98-1288 (La.3/19/99), ; Rick v. State, Dep’t of Transp.
  • Phillisa Jackson v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    In Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440, p. 7 (La.3/23/01), (citations omitted), the supreme court stated: The determination of liability under the duty/risk analysis usually requires proof of five separate elements: (1) proof that the defendant’s substandard conduct was a cause-in-fact of the plaintiff’s injuries (the cause-in-fact element); (2)
  • Bergeron v. Argonaut Great Cent. Ins. Co. 958 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.3/23/01), .
  • Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 947 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440, p. 9 (La.3/23/01), .
  • Hanks v. Entergy Corp. 944 So. 2d 564 La. 2006
    3/23/01), ; Benjamin, 04-1058 at p. 7, 893 So.2d at 6 ; Bonin , 03-3024 at p. 7, 877 So.2d at 95 .
  • Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc. 946 So. 2d 144 La. 2006
    Perkins v. Entergy Corporation, 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440, p. 7 (La.3/23/01), ; on reh'g, 556 So.2d at 13 (La.
  • Amos v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO. 936 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), .
  • Andry v. Murphy Oil, USA, Inc. 935 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    The trial court erred in failing to consider the controlling precedent of Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372, 00-1387, 00-1440 (La.3/23/01), ; 4.
  • Sims v. Ward 938 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Perkins v. Entergy Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.3/23/01), , supra at 613 (citing Ambrose, 639 So.2d at 221 ).