Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 808 So. 2d 294.

152 citing documents.

  • Associated Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Carbone Properties of Audubon, L.L.C. 962 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    When discerning the intent of the parties, “[t]he interpretation of a contract is the determination of the common intent of the parties with courts giving the contractual words their generally | ^prevailing meaning.” SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, p. 20 (La.6/29/01), , citing La.
  • H2O Hair, Inc. v. Marquette 960 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Dixie Services v. R & B Falcon Drilling USA 955 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, p. 20 (La.6/29/01), ; Meaghan Frances Hardcastle Trust v. Fleur De Paris, Ltd., XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.App.
  • Colvin v. LOUISIANA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND 947 So. 2d 15 La. 2007
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), ; Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), .
  • Vartech Systems, Inc. v. Hayden 951 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Advanced Products & Systems, Inc. v. Gary Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    6/29/01), Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., v. Untereker, 98- 1816 (La.App.
  • ETHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. McKay 943 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    6/29/01), , our Supreme Court recently reiterated the law and public policy of this state regarding noncompetition agreements: Louisiana has long had a strong public policy disfavoring noncompetition agreements between employers and employees.
  • Advance Products & Systems, Inc. v. Simon 944 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    See SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), ; Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., v. Untereker, 98-1816 (La.App.
  • Samuels v. Goodwin 950 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, p. 12 (La.6/29/01), .
  • CBD Docusource, Inc. v. Franks 934 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Ryan v. Blount Bros. Const., Inc. 927 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Richard v. Hall, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/23/04), ; SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), ; Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601 *1248 (La.10/20/98), .
  • Moss v. State 925 So. 2d 1185 La. 2006
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), ; Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), .
  • State Farm Auto. Inc. v. US Agencies 934 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Hamilton v. Royal Intern. Petroleum Corp. 934 So. 2d 25 La. 2006
    Richard v. Hall, 03-1488, p. 22 (La.4/23/04), ; SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Donovan Monceaux v. R & R Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, p. 17 (La.6/29/01), (“‘[W]here a new statute is worded differently from the preceding statute, the legislature is presumed to have intended to change the law.’”) (quoting Brown v. Texas-LACartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 7 (La.12/1/98), ); Louisiana Civil Service League v. Forbes, 258 La.
  • Monceaux v. R & R CONST., INC. 919 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, p. 17 (La.6/29/01), ("`[W]here a new statute is worded differently from the preceding statute, the *802 legislature is presumed to have intended to change the law.'") ( quoting Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 7 (La.12/1/98), ); Louisiana Civil Service League v. Forbes, 258 La.
  • Meaghan Frances Hardcastle v. De Paris 917 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Cao v. Stalder 915 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Sabine Police Jury v. Com'r of Alcohol 898 So. 2d 1244 La. 2005
    Co., XXXX-XXXX p. 3 (La.12/3/03), ; SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX p. 11 (La.6/29/01), (" SWAT 24 ").
  • Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc. v. Brown 901 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ; Louisiana Smoked Products, *556 Inc. v. Savoie's Sausage & Food Products, 96-1716, p. 11 (La.7/1/97), .
  • Henry Moreau and Geraldine Moreau v. Avoyelles Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Moreau v. Avoyelles Parish School Bd. 897 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), .
  • RJ Messinger, Inc. v. Rosenblum 894 So. 2d 1113 La. 2005
    Civ.Code art. 10; See SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), .
  • John Jay Esthetic Salon, Inc. v. Preskitt 898 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Robert Butch Trost, Sr. D/B/A Lake Area Insulation Drywall and Painting v. Donald O'Connor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    6/29/01), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that the restrictions on noncompetition agreements contained within La.R.S.
  • Trost v. O'CONNOR 893 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that the restrictions on noncompetition agreements contained within La.R.S.
  • Ferrell Lavergne v. Quality Fabricators of Eunice, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 2000-1695 (La.6/29/01), [,] [c]iting Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • State v. Johnson 884 So. 2d 568 La. 2004
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, p. 17 (La.6/29/01), ("`[W]here a new statute is worded differently from the preceding statute, the legislature is presumed to have intended to change the law.'") ( quoting Brown v. Texas-LACartage, Inc., 98-1063, p. 7 (La.12/1/98), ); Louisiana Civil Service League v. Forbes, 258 La.
  • Travis Lee Stevens v. Darren Keith Bruce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 2000-1695 (La.6/29/01), [c]iting Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • Stevens v. Bruce 878 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), [c]iting Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • Richard v. Hall 874 So. 2d 131 La. 2004
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.6/29/01), ; Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601, p. 15 (La.10/20/98), .
  • HOSE SPECIALTY & SUPPLY MANAG. v. Guccione 865 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    23:921 regarding noncompetition agreements is SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Distinguished Sola Communications, Inc. v. Tony Bailey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • Distinguished Sola Communications, Inc. v. Bailey 861 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    At the hearing on the request for the preliminary injunction, the exception of no cause of action, and motion for summary judgment, Mr. Bailey argued that the non-competition agreement was invalid due to the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Sultana Corp. v. Jewelers Mut. Ins. Co. 860 So. 2d 1112 La. 2003
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), , citing Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La7/7/99)
  • Chamblee v. Stalder 868 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Sidney Andrus v. Crowley Laundry & Dry Cleaners La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 2000-1695 (La.6/29/01), [c]iting Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • Andrus v. Crowley Laundry & Dry Cleaners 858 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), [c]iting Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • Boswell v. IEM 859 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    23:921 in that its term exceeded two years, and that the non-competition agreement had to be strictly construed as per SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.06/29/01), .
  • David v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc. 849 So. 2d 38 La. 2003
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Abshire v. Vermilion Parish School Bd. 848 So. 2d 552 La. 2003
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Richard Berry & Associates, Inc. v. Bryant 845 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In deciding the issue at bar, the trial court relied on SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Creative Risk Controls, Inc. v. Brechtel 847 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), ; Bail Bonds Unlimited, Inc. v. Chedville, 01-1401 (La.
  • Palmer v. BESE 842 So. 2d 363 La. 2003
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), Citing Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044, p. 5 (La.7/7/99)
  • Hoag v. State Ex Rel. Kennedy 836 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695, pp. 17-18 (La.6/29/01), -306 .
  • Bail Bonds Unlimited, Inc. v. Chedville 831 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    The trial court stated in oral reasons for judgment that it intended to rule in favor of Bail Bonds, however, the Louisiana Supreme Court case of SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Robbie Bond, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01) , which was decided on June 29, 2001, regarding non-competition clauses in employment contracts forced a different result.
  • Berry v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 835 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    See SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, XXXX-XXXX, p. 17 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Kyle v. Johnson 818 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 2000-1695, p. 12 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Bowie v. Young 813 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01); .
  • Bordelon v. Sayer 811 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond, 00-1695 (La.6/29/01); .