DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Pineville v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, 791 So. 2d 609.

30 citing documents.

  • Jeff Rizzo and Big Easy Catering and Events, LLC D/B/A Shenanigans Kitchen and Cocktails Versus Louisiana Office of … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
  • Kathleen May v. Diversified Healthcare-Abbeville,llc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
  • Michelle Williams and Nicole Williams Gross v. CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., and the City of Shreveport, Louisiana La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
  • Guffey v. Lexington House, LLC 254 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • James E. Guffey v. Lexington House, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • Butler v. Jefferson Parish Fire Department 186 So. 3d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983 (La.6/29/01), ).
  • Stead v. Swanner 52 So. 3d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Reed v. Evans 35 So. 3d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, 00-1983, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), ; Thomas v. Louisiana Dep’t of Public Safety and Corrections, 02-0897, pp. 9-10 (La.App.
  • Johnson v. Shafor 22 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, 00-1983, p. 5 (La.6/29/01), ; Thomas v. Louisiana Dep’t of Public Safety and Corrections, 02-0897, pp. 9-10 (La.App.
  • Wilbert Curry v. Javell McGinnis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    atutes deal with the same subject matter, they should be harmonized if possible; however, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.” City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983 (La.6/29/01), LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221 (La.7/8/98)
  • Curry v. McGinnis 3 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    ry construction, “where two statutes deal with the same subject matter, they should be harmonized if possible; however, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.” City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983 (La.6/29/01), ; LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221 (La.7/8/98), .
  • Burney v. EUNICE POLICE DEPT. 971 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Wanda G. Burney v. Eunice Police Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Wimberly v. Brown 973 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ; LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221, p. 7 (La.7/8/98), .
  • Roberts v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ).
  • Albert L. Roberts, Jr., Et Ux. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Richie, Richie & Oberle, L.L.P. v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 928 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    ized if possible; however, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.” Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 4 (La.6/29/05), (quoting City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ).
  • Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel 907 So. 2d 723 La. 2005
    City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983 (La.6/29/01), ; LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221 (La.7/8/98), .
  • Deshotel v. Guichard Operating Co., Inc. 916 So. 2d 72 La. 2004
    City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983 (La.6/29/01), (citation omitted).
  • State v. Campbell 877 So. 2d 112 La. 2004
    Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Black v. Black 879 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 2000-1983, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Anthony Deshotel v. Guichard Operating Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    6/29/01), (citations omitted).
  • Deshotel v. Guichard Operating Co., Inc. 861 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983 (La.6/29/01), (citations omitted).
  • La Grange v. Fire Protection Dist. No. 4 of St. Tammany Parish 868 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In interpreting these statutory provisions, we apply the following rules of statutory construction as set forth in City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 2000-1983, pp. 3-4 (La.6/29/01), , 612: When a law is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequences, it shall be applied as written and no further interpretation may be made in search of legislative intent.
  • Old Carrollton Neighborhood Ass'n v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Board of Zoning Adjustments 859 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See, City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 2000-1983, pp. 4-5 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd. 848 So. 2d 559 La. 2003
    art. 10; City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), .
  • Dufrene v. VIDEO CO-OP, LA. WORKERS'COMP. 843 So. 2d 1066 La. 2003
    See City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, 00-1983, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Thomas v. LOUISIANA DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY 848 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Hoag v. State Ex Rel. Kennedy 836 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    See also City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-1983, pp. 3-4 (La.6/29/01), .
  • Palmer v. BESE 822 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), .