Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill, 788 So. 2d 1154.

19 citing documents.

St. Bernard Port v. Violet Dock Port, Inc. 255 So. 3d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/15/01), , 1166 ) ) (hereinafter " Exxon Pipeline ").
ST. BERNARD PORT, HARBOR & TERMINAL DISTRICT v. VIOLET DOCK PORT, INC., LLC St. Bernard Port, Harbor & … 239 So. 3d 243 La. 2018
5/15/01), -60.13 The legislature and courts have developed rules that accept fair market value of the property as a relevant consideration in determining just compensation.
Angela D. v. West Jefferson Levee District 235 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. Violet Dock Port, Inc. 229 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5/15/01), (citations omitted).
City of Baton Rouge v. Nelson 166 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
These three approaches were recognized and explained by the supreme court in Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill, 00-2535 (La.5/15/01), , as follows: There are three generally accepted appraisal techniques: (1) the market approach; (2) the cost approach; and (8) the income approach....
St. Charles Land Co. II v. City of New Orleans ex rel. New Orleans Aviation Board 167 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill, 00-2535 (La.5/15/01); .
Borgnemouth Realty Co. v. Parish of St. Bernard 141 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Also, we find that Article 730 is an appropriate guide to be applied here because, as Justice Knoll has importantly noted, “the power of the State and private entities authorized by law to take property competes with the sacred and fundamental rights of citizens to own, control, use, enjoy, protect, and dispose of property.” Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill, 00-2535, p. 18 (La.5/15/01), (Knoll, J., concurring) (emphasis added).
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University v. Boudreaux's Tire & Auto Repair, L.L.C. 133 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
at p. 5, — So.3d at - (citing Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill, 00-2535, p. 8 (La.5/15/01), ).
Orleans Parish School Board v. State, Division of Administration 177 So. 3d 711 La. 2013
See Exxon Pipeline Company v. Hill, 00-2535, p. 8 (La.5/15/01), .
Elston v. Montgomery 70 So. 3d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
9:3183 (basis for determining value of expropriated property); Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill, 2000-2535 (La.5/15/01), .
State of La., Thru Dotd v. Paul Henry Wagner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5/15/01), State, Dep’t of Highways v. Rapier, 246 La.
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Wagner 25 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill, 00-2535 (La.5/15/01), ; State, Dep’t of Highways v. Rapier, 246 La.
State, DOTD v. McKeithen 976 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
48:453 A; Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill, 2000-2535 (La.5/15/01), ; State v. Schwegmann Westside Expy., 95-1261 (La.3/1/96), .
City of Baton Rouge v. TERRACE LAND COMPANY, INC. 962 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Liberty Mutual v. Noble 889 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
^Article 1, Section 2, of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, provides that “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, except by due process of law.” Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill, 00-2535 (La.5/15/01), .
City of Baton Rouge v. Johnca Properties, L.L.C. 873 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
1 Cir. 6/23/00) , , rev'd on other grounds, 00-2535 (La.5/15/01), , State, (La.App.
Pioneer Valley Hosp. v. Elmwood Partners LLC 800 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill, 00-2559 (La.5/15/01), -1158 .
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill 796 So. 2d 665 La. 2001
We grant Exxon Pipeline Company’s application for rehearing for the sole purpose of clarifying the cases and parties addressed by our original opinion in Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Hill, 00-2535 c/w 00-2559 (La.5/15/01), .
Lemaire v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. 793 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
1 Cir. 6/23/00) , , rev'd., 2000-2535, 2000-2559 (La.5/15/01), .