Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Medical Review Panel, Claim of Moses, 788 So. 2d 1173.

76 citing documents.

In Re: Medical Review Panel Proceeding of Ronald Laporte (D) La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
In Re: Medical Review Panel of Clarence Noble, Jr., Betty Jean Johnson, Beverly Jean Culpepper, Cynthia Noble, Bruce … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
5/25/01), Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd.
Alfred Ray Hatch v. Jerry Michael Watkins and the Lamar Companies La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Neville Kirt; Alvin Kirt; And Lamont Kirt, Individually and on Behalf of Elaine Kirt v. Rebecca C. Metzinger, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Roxine Lachney v. James L. Gates, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Cheryl And Michael Mitchell v. Baton Rouge Orthopedic Clinic, L.L.C. And Robert W. Easton, M.D. La. 2021
5/25/01), ; See also Carter, 04-0646, p. 12, 892 So.
Pamela Fisher v. the Blood Center and Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Rhoda Timpton v. Touro Infirmary and Dr. Richard L. Meyer … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Eileen Granier and Brett Granier v. Lexington Insurance Company, Health Care Indemnity, Inc., Vernon J. Carriere, M.D. and … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
In re Med. Review Panel of Gerard Lindquist 274 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5/25/01), , the Supreme Court considered the application of La.
In re Med. Review Complaint By Daron Downing 272 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Shane R. Pierce and Kimberly M. Pierce v. Irma M. Rodriguez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Pierce v. Rodriguez 268 So. 3d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Cook v. La. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr. 267 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Harris v. Breaud 243 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Fie, LLC v. New Jax Condo Ass'n, Inc. 241 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In re Medical Review Panel Proceedings of Glover 229 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
In re Guidry 225 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/25/01), , 1178 stating: [A] one-year prescription period (which parallels the general tort period) is the general rule, which applies to all types of medical malpractice actions.
Wilkerson v. Dunham 218 So. 3d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Jimerson v. Majors 211 So. 3d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Ronald Millard Irby v. Tony Mancuso, Sheriff of Calcasieu Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Irby v. Mancuso 201 So. 3d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Linda M. Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/25/01), (emphasis added), as follows: [A] one-year prescription period (which parallels the general tort period) is the general rule, which applies to all types of medical malpractice actions.
Linda M. Snavely, Ind. Obo B. Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/25/01), (emphasis added), as follows: [A] one-year prescription period (which parallels the general tort period) is the general rule, which applies to all types of medical malpractice actions.
Snavely v. Ace Pain Management, LLC 184 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Application of the one-year prescriptive period with respect to damages that are immediately apparent was discussed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in In re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Moses, 00-2643, pp. 7-8 (La.5/25/01), (emphasis added), as follows: [A] one-year prescription period (which parallels the general tort period) is the general rule,' which applies to all types of medical malpractice actions.
In the Matter of the Professional Liability Claim of Brian Snavely (D) La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
In re the Professional Liability Claim of Snavely 178 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See In re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Moses, 00-2643 (La.5/25/01) .
In Re: Medical Review Panel Proceeding of Donna M. Hickman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
In re Medical Review Panel Proceeding of Hickman 158 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Moses, 00-2643 (La.5/25/01), .
In re Halm 128 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In In re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Moses, 00-2643 (La.5/25/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the requirement that continued tortious treatment or conduct on defendant’s part is an essential element for possibly invoking the continuing tort doctrine.
Woods v. Cousins 102 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
Review Panel for Claim of Moses, 00-2643 (La.5/25/01), -76 .
Joseph v. North American Risk Services 86 So. 3d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In re Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Moses, 2000-2643, p. 6 (La.5/25/01), ; Lopez v. House of Non-Denomination Ministries, 2009-1147 (La.App.
Barcia v. Louisiana Medical Malpractice Insurance Co. 67 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 In support of their argument that the prescriptive period in the instant matter was suspended, the Barcias point to Footnote 10 of In re: Medical Review Panel of Moses, 00-2643, p. 8 (La.5/25/01), , for their argument that pursuant to the “discovery doctrine,” codified in La.
Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 48 So. 3d 234 La. 2010
As we held in In re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Moses, 00-2643 (La.5/25/01), , “[w]hen .a defendant’s damage-causing act is completed, the existence of continuing damages to the plaintiff, even progressively worsening damages, does not present successive causes of action accruing because of a continuing tort.” Any continued dissolution into the groundwater is the continuation of the harm
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc. 45 So. 3d 991 La. 2010
13 In re Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Moses, 00-2643, p. 15 (La.5/25/01), .
In Re Manus 40 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
at 13, 892 So.2d at 1269 , citing In re Moses, 00-2643, p. 11 (La.5/25/01), .
Lopez v. House of Faith Non-Denomination Ministries 29 So. 3d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In re Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Moses, 2000-2643, p. 6 (La.5/25/01), .
Gilmore v. Whited 9 So. 3d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Id.; see also In Re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Moses, 2000-2643, p. 6 (La.5/25/01), .
Zoulek v. PIP America 2 So. 3d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See In re Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Maria Moses, 00-2643, pp. 7-10 (La.5/25/01), -1179 .
Demma v. Automobile Club 998 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Moses, 00-2643, p. 6 (La.5/25/01), .
Ferguson v. Sugar 988 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
This exception was based on Louisiana Supreme Court decision in In re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Moses, 2000-2643 (La.5/25/01), and La.
Carter v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation 978 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
See, In re Medical Review Panel Claim of Moses, 002-2543, p. 6, (La.5/25/01), .
Dunn v. City of Baton Rouge 984 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In Re Medical Review Panel for Claim of Moses, 00-2643, p. 6 (La.5/25/01), .
Baldini v. East Jefferson General Hosp. 976 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
In re: Medical Review Panel for Claim for Moses, 00-2643, p. 8 (La.5/25/01), .
Stanford v. ADMINISTRATORS OF TULANE FUND 975 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
In re Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Moses, 00-2643, p. 6 (La.5/25/01), -1178 ; Grant v. Tulane University, 02-0848, p. 3 (La.App.
Haynes v. Hunter 973 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
LEJEUNE BROS. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co. 981 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Rev. Panel of Moses, 00-2643 (La.5/25/01), .
Lejeune Brothers, Inc. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co., LLC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Bertoniere v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 972 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See, Medical Review Panel for Claim of Moses, In re, 00-2643 (La.5/25/01), .
Bertoniere v. JEFFERSON PARISH HOSP. 972 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
See, Medical Review Panel for Claim of Moses, In re, 00-2643 (La.5/25/01), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by