DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 784 So. 2d 1284.

30 citing documents.

  • Carol Joseph v. At&t La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • Angela Leonards v. Carmichael's Cashway Pharmacy, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
  • Robert Daniels v. The State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Transportation and Development La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    5/15/01), Young v. Physicians & Surgeons Hosp., 39,348 (La.
  • Daniels v. State Through Department of Transportation and Development 275 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    5/15/01), ; Young v. Physicians & Surgeons Hosp.
  • Kendrick v. Hercules Concrete Pumping Service, Inc. 216 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    05/15/01), ; Gilliam, supra.
  • Allen v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc. 211 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    5/15/01), ; Young v. Physicians & Surgeons Hosp., 39,348 (La.App.
  • O'Bannon v. Moriah Technologies, Inc. 196 So. 3d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 2000-3263 (La.5/15/01), , 1291 n. 9; , 1371 n. 15 (La.1993).
  • Allensworth v. Grand Isle Shipyard, Inc. 178 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3268 (La.5/15/01), .
  • Gilliam v. Brooks Heating & Air Conditioning 146 So. 3d 734 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 (La.5/15/01), ; Hollingsworth v. Steven Garr Logging, 47,884 (La.App.2d Cir.2/27/13), .
  • Machado v. Baker Concrete Construction 128 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 (La.5/15/01); .
  • Gordon v. Turner Industries Group, LLC 129 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 (La.5/15/01); .
  • Hollingsworth v. Steven Garr Logging 110 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 (La.5/15/01), ; Young v. Physicians & Surgeons Hosp., 39,348 (La.App.2d Cir.3/2/05), .
  • Simmons v. Task Force Staffing Services, Inc. 30 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263, p. 10 (La.5/15/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the requirement of physical work stress: The requirement of physical work stress means “physical work stress in the job environment.” 13 Wex S. Malone & H. Alston Johnson, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise: Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Law and Practice § 261 p. 668 (3rd
  • Murray v. SERVALL SERVICES, INC. 31 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263, p. 4 (La.5/15/01), .
  • Decquir v. Acorn 18 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Ms. Decquir, citing the Supreme Court case of, Hatcher v. Diebold, 2003-3263 (La.5/15/01), , argues that she had met the clear and convincing evidence standard in proving her claim and she further asserts that “the clear and convincing standard in a worker’s compensation case is an ‘intermediate standard falling somewhere between the ordinary ‘preponderance of the evidence’ civil standard and the beyond a r
  • Hirachi v. Kamata 15 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 (La.5/15/01), -91 .
  • Populis v. Home Depot, Inc. 991 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 (La.5/15/01), -91 .
  • City of Shreveport v. Casciola 980 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Hatcherson v. Diebold Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.5/15/01), .
  • Baker v. TMSEL 970 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Pursuant to the holding of the Louisiana Supreme Court in Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 (La.5/15/01), , a showing of "physical work stress" is required prior to compensability for a perivascular injury under the workers' compensation statute.
  • Poole v. Terrell Musgrove Siding & Gutter 917 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Comeaux, supra; Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 (La.5/15/01), ; Young v. Physicians & Surgeons Hosp., 39,348 (La.
  • Bonvillain v. Preferred Industries and LWCC 917 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Comeaux v. City of Crowley, 01-0032, pp. 8-9 (La.7/3/01), , quoting Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263, p. 4 (La.5/15/01), .
  • Young v. Physicians & Surgeons Hosp. 895 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Hatcherson v. Diebold Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.5/15/01), .
  • Allen v. Schneider National Bulk Carriers 885 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    standard.” Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 (La.5/15/01), (citing Black’s Law Dictionary 227 (5th ed.1979)).
  • Osborn v. Unit Drilling Co. 886 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 (La.5/15/01), -91 .
  • Sarrio v. Stalling Const. Co. 876 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 at p. 4 (La.5/15/01), (citing Black's Law Dictionary 227 (5th ed.1979)); Comeaux v. City of Crowley, 01-0032, p. 9 (La.7/3/01), ; Kaiser v. Western-Southern Ins.
  • Martin Petitjean II v. W. Petitjean Operating Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    5/15/01), the widow of a customer service manager was denied workers’ compensation death benefits when her husband suffered a pulmonary thromboembolism while engaged in the course and scope of his employment.
  • Petitjean v. W. Petitjean Operating Co. 856 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 (La.5/15/01), , the widow of a customer service manager was denied workers’ compensation death benefits when her husband suffered a pulmonary thromboembolism while engaged in the course and scope of his employment.
  • Kaiser v. Western-Southern Ins. Co. 821 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 at p. 4 (La.5/15/01), (citing Black's Law Dictionary 227 (5th ed.1979)); Comeaux v. City of Crowley 01-0032 (La.7/3/01), .
  • Smith v. Season's Manufacturing 815 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    ecently recognized that the “clear and convincing” standard in a workers’ compensation case is “an intermediate standard falling somewhere between the ordinary preponderance of the evidence civil standard and beyond a reasonable doubt criminal standard.” Comeaux v. City of Crowley, 01-0032, pp. 8-9 (La.7/3/01); , 1220 quoting Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263, p. 4 (La.5/15/01); (Citing Black’s Law Dictionary 227 (5th ed. 1979)).
  • Comeaux v. City of Crowley 793 So. 2d 1215 La. 2001
    Hatcherson v. Diebold, Inc., 00-3263 at p. 4 (La.5/15/01), (citing Black's Law Dictionary 227 (5th ed.1979)).