DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sander v. Brousseau, 772 So. 2d 709.

21 citing documents.

  • Keshawn Patterson v. Tacarra Charles La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
    App. 4 Cir. 10/4/00), –11).
  • Shaw v. Young 199 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Jackson v. Pfeifer 152 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • Raymond v. Fluellen 88 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • Griggs v. Harrah's Casino 929 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • Shaunn Caillier McCorvey v. Derriel Carlton McCorvey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • McCorvey v. McCorvey 922 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • CII CARBON v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 918 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • Cochrane v. Louisiana Tax Com'n 905 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • Williams v. Belle of Orleans, L.L.C. 890 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • McCarter v. Sanchez 874 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 10/4/00), , where this Court stated that “[appellate review of a question of law involves a determination of whether the lower court’s interpretive decision is legally correct.” *922 Assignments of Error Continental has made seven assignments of error.
  • Night & Day Partners, Ltd. v. Great American Real Food Fast, Inc. 876 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 10/4/00), , where the Court stated that “[a]ppellate review of a question of law involves a determination of whether the lower court’s interpretive decision is legally correct.” Wrongful Eviction Great American contends that the trial court erred as a matter of law in granting Night and Day’s action for eviction without re
  • Goll v. Bugsy's Bar & Grill, Inc. 870 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 10/4/00), , where this Court stated that “[ajppellate review of a question of law involves a determination of whether the lower court’s interpretive decision is legally correct.” Assignments of Error The Golls list three assignments of error in their brief.
  • Sanford v. City of New Orleans 866 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 10/4/00), , where this Court stated that "[a]ppellate review of a question of law involves a determination of whether the lower court's interpretive decision is legally correct."
  • Mendonca v. Tidewater Inc. 862 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 10/4/00), , where this Court stated that "[a]ppellate review of a question of law involves a determination of whether the lower court's interpretive decision is legally correct."
  • Faust v. Greater Lakeside Corp. 861 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 10/4/00), , where this Court stated that "[a]ppellate review of a question of law involves a determination of whether the lower court's interpretive decision is legally correct."
  • Pelleteri v. Caspian Group Inc. 851 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    App. 4 Cir. 10/4/00), , where this Court stated that "[a]ppellate review of a question of law involves a determination of whether the lower court's interpretive decision is legally correct."
  • Panacon v. Kahn 818 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Johnson v. Louisiana Tax Commission 807 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 10/4/00) , , 711 citing Phoenix Assur.
  • Johnson v. Louisiana Tax Commission 807 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 10/4/00) , , 711 citing Phoenix Assur.
  • Amar v. Industrial Safety & Health 805 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 10/4/2000) , ; Baldwin v. Greater Lakeside Corp., 93-768 (La.App.