DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stevens v. Department of Police, 789 So. 2d 622.

31 citing documents.

  • Sabrina Richardson v. New Orleans Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
  • Anthony Edenfield v. New Orleans Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    App. 4 Cir. 5/9/01), provided: The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Matthew Morrison v. New Orleans Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
  • Roy Neely v. Department of Fire La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
  • Randi Gant v. New Orleans Police Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
  • Rivet v. Dep't of Police 258 So. 3d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 5/9/01), , 627 (internal citations omitted): The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Clark v. Department of Police 155 So. 3d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 5/9/01), [citation omitted.]
  • Huval v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 29 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Rigney v. Department of Police 10 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 5/9/01), , 627: The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Adams v. Department of Police 7 So. 3d 763 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 5/9/01), , which urges a contrary focus: "Indeed, the Commission should give heightened regard to appointing authorities that serve as special guardians of the public's safety and operate as quasi-military institutions where strict discipline is imperative."
  • Brown v. Department of Police 999 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • THORNABAR v. Department of Police 997 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 5/9/01) , , 627: The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Singleton v. Department of Police 983 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    App. 4 Cir. 5/9/01), , we stated: The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Cornelius v. Department of Police 981 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • Reed v. Department of Police 967 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 5/9/01), , we stated: The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Marks v. New Orleans Police Dept. 943 So. 2d 1028 La. 2006
  • Pope v. New Orleans Police Dept. 903 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    4 Cir. 5/9/01) , , we reversed the Commission's reduction of a suspension from fifteen days to ten days for an officer's running of a stop sign and causing an accident with another vehicle.
  • Butler v. New Orleans Police Dept. 885 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 5/9/01), , this court held: The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust, citing
  • Burkart v. New Orleans Police Department 871 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 5/9/01), , this Court stated as follows: The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Broaden v. Department of Police 866 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 5/9/01), , this Court held: The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Whitaker v. New Orleans Police Dept. 863 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 5/9/01), , the officer was responding to a call of an undercover officer in distress.
  • Thompson v. New Orleans Police Dept. 844 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    4 Cir. 5/9/01), , 627: The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Berry v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 835 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Smith v. New Orleans Police Department 820 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 5/9/01) , , this court discussed the scope of the authority a civil service commission has in reviewing a disciplinary action.
  • Moore v. New Orleans Police Dept. 813 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 5/10/01), , the police department, as a special guardian of the public's safety, has the right to establish appropriate standards for its employees; and the Civil Service Commission is required to give heightened regard to those entities operating as special gua
  • Penn v. New Orleans Police Department 812 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir. 5/9/01), , we said: The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Fernandez v. New Orleans Fire Department 809 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir 5/9/01), , 627 that: |sThe public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Danigole v. New Orleans Police Department 812 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    4 Cir 5/9/01), , 627 that: The public puts its trust in the police department as a guardian of its safety, and it is essential that the appointing authority be allowed to establish and enforce appropriate standards of conduct for its employees sworn to uphold that trust.
  • Hebert v. New Orleans Police Department 805 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Williams v. New Orleans Police Department 800 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 5/9/01) , , we reversed the Commission’s reduction of a suspension from fifteen days to ten days for an officer’s running of a stop sign and causing an accident with another vehicle.
  • Fihlman v. New Orleans Police Dept. 797 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 5/9/01), , we reversed the Commission's reduction of a suspension from fifteen days to ten days for an officer's running of a stop sign and causing an accident with another vehicle.