Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Harvey v. Cole, 808 So. 2d 771.

27 citing documents.

Henry Patterson v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Starr v. Brou 8 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Cannet v. Franklynn Pest Control Co., Inc. 985 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 1/23/02), ; Webster v. Ballard, 05-2247, p. 3 (La.App.
Talbert v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CAS. IN. CO. 971 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Best v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 969 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Hornot v. Cardenas 968 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc. 992 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 1/23/02) , -783 , a suit resulting from injuries sustained in an automobile accident by three plaintiffs, upheld all general and special damages awarded to plaintiff Randolph Polk.
Webster v. Ballard 961 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 1/23/02) , , and a general damages award is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard.
Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc. 950 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 1/23/02) , -783 , a suit resulting from injuries sustained in an automobile accident by three plaintiffs, upheld all general and special damages awarded to plaintiff Randolph Polk.
Horstmann v. Farber 944 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Raiford v. U.S. Industries/Ames Lawn & Garden Tools 929 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Raiford v. US INDUSTRIES/AMES LAWN 929 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Griggs v. Harrah's Casino 929 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Jaramillo v. Lopez 925 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Sadhwani v. James 930 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Becker v. Tampira 901 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
McCarter v. Sanchez 874 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Night & Day Partners, Ltd. v. Great American Real Food Fast, Inc. 876 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Goll v. Bugsy's Bar & Grill, Inc. 870 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Craige v. Broome 869 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4th Cir.1/23/02), -776 , this Court stated: The standard of appellate review of a trial court's findings of facts was enunciated in Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, pp. 4-5 (La.1/29/96), , as follows: It is a well settled principle that an appellate court may not set aside a trial court's findin
Sanford v. City of New Orleans 866 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Sanborn v. Methodist Behavioral Resources Partnership 866 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Moore v. Kenilworth/Kailas Properties 865 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 1/28/02) , , each party referencing awards to different plaintiffs in that case.
Pelleteri v. Caspian Group Inc. 851 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Deutschmann v. Rosiere 844 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Kirklin v. Joseph 839 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
4th Cir.1/23/02), , this Court stated: The standard of appellate review of a trial court’s findings of facts was enunciated in Mistich v. Volkswagen of Germany, Inc., 95-0939, pp. 4-5 (La.1/29/96), , as follows: It is a well settled principle that an appellate court may not set aside a trial court’s finding of fact
Richardson v. O'BYRNE 830 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by