DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 784 So. 2d 627.

96 citing documents.

  • Charlotte Alfred v. Larry Butler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Alfred v. Butler 28 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Martin [v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01) ], .
  • Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023, p. 3 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Castille v. Bellanger 999 So. 2d 765 La. 2009
    See Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Castille v. Bellanger 999 So. 2d 765 La. 2009
    See Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Byron P. Guillory v. Jennifer D. Lee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Guillory v. Lee 998 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Ferguson v. Sugar 988 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Campbell v. Tork, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.2/20/04), ; Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Moore v. Acadian Ambulance Air Med 983 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Linda Moore v. Safeway Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Forbes v. Cockerham 985 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.4/3/01), -632 .
  • Stamps v. Dunham 968 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 4-5 (La.4/3/01), -632 .
  • Carey Davis v. Harrah's Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Davis v. HARRAH'S LAKE CHARLES, LLC 945 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Martin [v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01)], .
  • Patsy Ann Collins Domingue v. Excalibar Minerals of La La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01)
  • Domingue v. EXCALIBAR MINERALS OF LOUISIANA 936 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Horton v. Mayeaux 931 So. 2d 338 La. 2006
    In support of its argument, State Farm cites this court's recent decision in Martin v. Heritage Manor House, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), , in which this case quoted and emphasized the following language: The fact that a determination on a motion for new trial involves judicial discretion, however, does not imply that the trial court can freely interfere with any verdict with which it disagrees.
  • Corso v. Laborde 927 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    The standard of review for determining when a JNOV has been properly granted was thoroughly restated in Martin v. Heritage Manor South, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), n. 3 , as follows: The motion [for JNOV] should be granted only when the evidence points so strongly in favor of the moving party that reasonable persons could not reach different conclusions, not merely when there is a preponderance of evidence for the mover.
  • Bell v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 927 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • In Re Gramercy Plant Explosion at Kaiser 927 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Davis v. Lazarus 927 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    In Martin v. Heritage Manor South, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 4-5 (La.4/3/01), -632 , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained these different standards as follows: A motion for a new trial requires a less stringent test than for a JNOV as such a *465 determination involves only a new trial and does not deprive the parties of their right to have all disputed issues resolved by a jury.
  • CASH POINT PLANTATION EQUESTRIAN v. Shelton 920 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), ; (La.App.
  • Sciambra v. Jerome Imports, Inc. 921 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    We are guided by the principles set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023, pp. 4-6 (La.4/3/01), -632 .
  • Cook v. Stowe 914 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.04/03/01), , Campbell v. Tork, Inc., 03-1341 (La.02/20/04), .
  • Wright v. Bennett 924 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    1st Cir.4/3/01), ; (La.App.
  • Mary Williams and Melvin George Williams v. W.O. Moss Regional Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Williams v. WO MOSS REGIONAL MED. CENTER 903 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • McGhee v. Wallace Drennan, Inc. 904 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Poche v. Allstate Ins. Co. 900 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023, p. 4 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Davis v. Fenerty 892 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    *60 Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Shirley Gauthier v. Newty Paul Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Gauthier v. Gauthier 886 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 4/24/96), ; Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Torrejon v. Mobil Oil Co. 876 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, XXXX-XXXX, p. 6, n. 6 (La.4/3/01), (citing Scott v. Hospital Service Dist.
  • Pontchartrain Materials Corp. v. PLAQUEMINES PARISH GOVERN. 871 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Explained Campbell v. Tork, Inc. 870 So. 2d 968 La. 2004
    A trial judge may order a new trial if a jury's verdict cannot be supported by "any fair interpretation of the evidence" Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), -632 .
  • Boylston v. Tidwell 852 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    In the recent case of Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), , the supreme court emphasized: The fact that a determination on a motion for new trial involves judicial discretion, however, does not imply that the trial court can freely interfere with any verdict with which it disagrees.
  • Davis v. Witt 851 So. 2d 1119 La. 2003
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.4/30/01), .
  • Cupit v. State 847 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Martin v. h?Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • LeBlanc v. Western Heritage Insurance Co. 837 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Johnston v. Hendricks 821 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.04/03/01), ; Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 00-0445 (La.11/28/00), .
  • Simmons v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. 819 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, 2000-1023 (La.4/3/01), ; La.Code Civ.
  • Green v. Benson and Gold Chevrolet 811 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Johnston v. Hendricks 803 So. 2d 979 La. 2001
    Martin v. Heritage Manor South, 00-1023 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Adams v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 804 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Templet v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. and Development 818 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See Martin v. *58 Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.4/3/01), .
  • Posey v. Singletary 795 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    In Martin v. Heritage Manor South Nursing Home, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/03/2001), , the supreme court explained that deciding whether to grant a new trial requires a discretionary balancing of many factors.