DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 798 So. 2d 93.

26 citing documents.

  • Thomas Anderson v. City of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
  • Cynthia Anne Cole v. Sabine Bancshares, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • Cole v. Sabine Bancshares, Inc. 258 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Lynn E. Foret, M.D. La. 2016
    37 Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 2000-2799 (La.10/16/01)
  • Paul v. State, Department of Public Safety 182 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 2000-2799 (La.10/16/01), .
  • State v. Foret 174 So. 3d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 2000-2799 (La.10/16/01), .
  • Dwayne Chauvin v. Exxon Mobil Corporation 158 So. 3d 761 La. 2014
  • Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar 145 So. 3d 271 La. 2014
    See and compare, Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 00-2799, p. 8 (La.10/16/01), -01 (former La.
  • Oleszkowicz v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 129 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
    In Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 00-2799 (La.10/16/01); , the supreme court faced the issue of whether Article 2315.3 applied to a wrongful death action where the cause of action for wrongful death arose after the 12nenactment of the Article, but the conduct giving rise to the damages, specifically *1287 plaintiff’s exposure to asbestos, occurred prior to the enactment of
  • Succession of Ursin v. Board of Levee Commissioners 104 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    “Once a cause of action accrues, a party has a vested right in the cause of action that a new substantive law cannot take away.” Anderson v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 00-2799, p. 6 (La.10/16/01), .
  • ADELMANN-CHESTER v. Kent 33 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 7/30/08), , citing Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 2000-2799, p. 3 (La.10/16/01), .
  • Talley v. St. Tammany Parish School Board 5 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Brown v. Schwegmann 990 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 2000-2799, p. 3 (La.10/16/01), .
  • Grefer v. Alpha Technical 901 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Because the plaintiffs' cause of action accrued before 1984, and article 2315.3 cannot be applied retroactively under Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 2000-2799, p. 3 (La.10/16/01), , Exxon asserts the plaintiffs are precluded from recovering exemplary damages.
  • Succession of Comeaux 896 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    “ ‘Substantive laws,’ for purposes of determining whether a law should be applied retroactively, are those which establish new rules, rights, and duties, or change existing ones.” Anderson[ v. Avondale Industries, 00-2799 (La.10/16/01), ]supra at 97; Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp.
  • Tammatha Messina v. Isle of Capri Casino La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    “‘Substantive laws,’ for purposes of determining whether a law should be applied retroactively, are those which establish new rules, rights, and duties, or change existing ones.” Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), (quoting Anderson v. Avondale Indus., 00-2799 (La.10/16/01), citing Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp.
  • Messina v. Isle of Capri Casino 891 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), (quoting Anderson v. Avondale Indus., 00-2799 (La.10/16/01), ; citing Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp.
  • Don R. Young v. Gulf Coast Carpets La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Young v. Gulf Coast Carpets 888 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-719, 03-993, 03-1002, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), (quoting Anderson v. Avondale Ind., 00-2799, p. 3 (La.10/16/01), ).
  • Samuel Chesne v. Elevated Tank Applicators, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    10/16/01), Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp.
  • Chesne v. Elevated Tank Applicators, Inc. 874 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), (quoting Anderson v. Avondale Indus., 00-2799 (La.10/16/01), ; Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp.
  • Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 864 So. 2d 117 La. 2004
    art. 2315 The executive officers and directors of Avondale and McDermott argue that Mrs. Landry's loss of consortium claim did not arise until Mr. Landry was diagnosed with mesothelioma, but that under our holding in Anderson v. Avondale Industries, 00-2799 (La.10/16/01), , the 1982 amendment to La.
  • Day v. MOREHOUSE GENERAL HOSP. 865 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    10/16/01), pp. 97-99 , which cites 1 Planiol, Treatise on the Civil Law, § 243 (La.St.L.Inst.Trans.1959).
  • Kemp v. Armstrong World Industries 855 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Walls v. American Optical Corp., No. 98-0455 (La.9/8/99), , 1268 and also in Anderson v. Avondale Industries, Inc., No.2000-2799 (La.10/16/01), , 99 cites Pitre , noting, incorrectly, that the LPLA was not applied.
  • Hazelwood Farm, Inc. v. Liberty Oil and Gas Corp. 844 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Anderson v. Avondale Ind., Inc., 00-2799 (La.10/16/01); .
  • Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. 824 So. 2d 1137 La. 2002
    553 , 62 L.Ed.2d 481 (1980) (holding that a state tort claim is a species of property protected by the due process clause); Anderson v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 00-2799, p. 6 (La.10/16/01), ("Once a cause of action accrues, a party has a vested right in the cause of action that a new substantive law cannot take away.").