Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Blanchard, 786 So. 2d 701.

34 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Anthony L. Lane La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State v. Marenco 236 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/20/01), , 704 ; State v. R.A.L.
State of Louisiana v. Lorrie A. Anderson AKA Lorrie Ann Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
4/20/01), where the trial court denied the defendant‟s motion to withdraw his guilty pleas because of lack of notification of the registration requirements.
State v. Anderson 214 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/20/01), , where the trial court denied the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty pleas because of lack of notification of the registration requirements.
State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Bergeron, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01)
State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Bergeron, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01)
State v. Domangue 119 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01), .
State of Louisiana v. David Iburg AKA David Ralph Saracino La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Iburg 101 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Blanchard, 00-1147, p. 4 (La.4/20/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Wendell Joseph Bienvenu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
The supreme court revisited the issue in State v. Blanchard, 00– 1147, p. 3 (La.4/20/01), –04, and the procedural history reads as follows: On appeal, the Third Circuit reversed upon finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying respondent‟s motion to withdraw his pleas.
State v. Young 71 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
For example, in State v. Blanchard, 2000-1147 (La.4/20/01), , the defendant alleged that his guilty pleas to sex offenses were not intelligently made because: (1) he mistakenly believed that he could avoid the sex offender registration requirements; (2) the State’s late production of other crimes evidence rendered his subsequent plea involuntary; and (3) he pled guilty at coun
State v. R.A.L. 69 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The supreme court discussed their ruling in Calhoun in State v. Blanchard, 00-1147, p. 4 (La.4/20/01), (alteration in original), where they stated: 17With regard to the trial court’s failure to address Louisiana’s sex offender registration and notice provisions at the time respondent entered his pleas, we made our observation as to the importance of a similar failing in Calhoun in the context of testimony by the p
State v. RAL 69 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
The supreme court discussed their ruling in Calhoun in State v. Blanchard, 00-1147, p. 4 (La.4/20/01), (alteration in original), where they stated: With regard to the trial court's failure to address Louisiana's sex offender registration and notice provisions at the time respondent entered his pleas, we made our observation as to the importance of a similar failing in Calhoun in the context of testimony by the pet
State of Louisiana v. G. T., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
4/20/01), -04, and the procedural history reads as follows: On appeal, the Third Circuit reversed upon finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying respondent’s motion to withdraw his pleas.
State v. GT, JR. 71 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The supreme court revisited the issue in State v. Blanchard, 00-1147, p. 3 (La.4/20/01), -04 , and the procedural history reads as follows: On appeal, the Third Circuit reversed upon finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying respondent’s motion to withdraw his pleas.
State of Louisiana v. A. D. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. A.D.L. 64 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
See State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01), .
State v. Smith 38 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
And, conversely, we noted State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01), , where the Louisiana Supreme Court found no basis to allow the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea despite the trial court’s failure to advise him of the sex registration requirements during the plea colloquy.
State of Louisiana v. T. V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. TV 993 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Smith 993 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Conversely, in State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court distinguished Calhoun and found no basis to allow the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea despite the fact the trial court had failed to advise him of the sex registration requirements during the plea colloquy.
State v. Morris 982 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Blanchard, 2000-1147 (La.4/20/01)
State of Louisiana v. D.G.H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01)
State v. D.G.H. 969 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01), .
State v. Parker 963 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01), .
State v. Wade 908 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Blanchard, *1226 XXXX-XXXX (La.4/20/01), ; State v. Ellis, supra ; State v. Jones, supra ; State v. Battaglia, 03-692 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Roy D. Roe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Roe 903 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01), .
State v. Sellers 902 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Blanchard, 2000-1147, p. 4 (La.4/20/01), .
State v. Ellis 880 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.04/20/01), ; State v. Jones, supra ; State v. Battaglia, 03-692 (La.App.
State v. Lyles 858 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
See, State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01), .
State v. Moore 847 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
See State v. Calhoun, 96-0786 (La.5/20/97); ; State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01); , State v. Blaine Andre Williams, 02-0707 (La.App.
State v. Williams 839 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
In State v. Blanchard, 00-1147 (La.4/20/01); , the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the trial court's denial of a motion to withdraw a plea.
State v. Williams 830 So. 2d 984 La. 2002
State v. Blanchard, 00-1147, p. 6 (La.4/20/01), (citations omitted).