Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Maise, 805 So. 2d 1141.

69 citing documents.

State v. Weaver 917 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Maise, 00-1158 (La.1/15/02), .
State v. Lewis 917 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Maise, 00-1158 (La.1/15/02), .
State v. Wade 908 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
5th Cir.3/22/00), , writ granted, XXXX-XXXX (La.9/14/01), , and judgment affirmed, XXXX-XXXX *1230 (La.1/15/02), ; State v. Smith, 97-1075 (La.App.
State v. Mills 900 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 3/22/00) , , writ granted, 00-1158 (La.9/14/01), , judgment affm'd, 00-1158 (La.1/15/02), .
State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Maise, XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.1/15/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Charles Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Brown 874 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Fradieu 851 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Maise, 00-1158, pp. 10-11 (La.1/15/02); .
State v. Simmons 845 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Maise, 00-1158 (La.1/15/02), ; State v. Stevenson, 00-1296 (La.App.
State v. Saltzman 843 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Maise, 00-1158, pp. 10-11 (La.1/15/02); .
State v. Dauzart 844 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
App. 5 Cir. 3/22/00), , writ granted, 00-1158 (La.9/14/01), , judgment aff'd, 00-1158 (La.1/15/02), .
State v. Marshall 841 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 3/22/00), , writ granted, 00-1158 (La.9/14/01), , judgment aff'd, 00-1158 (La.1/15/02), .
State v. Fortino 837 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5th Cir.3/22/00), , writ granted, 00-1158 (La.9/14/01), , judgment aff'd, 00-1158 (La.1/15/02), .
State v. Quiambao 833 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Maise, 00-1158 (La.1/15/02), ; (La.
State v. Cho 831 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Maise, 00-1158, p. 16 (La.1/15/02), .
State v. Moore 827 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
In State v. Maise, 00-1158, p. 12 (La.1/15/02); , the supreme court recently stated the following regarding the validity of a juvenile's statement: The defendant was a juvenile at the time of his statement to Ms. Brown.
State v. Taylor 821 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Maise, 00-1158 (La.1/15/02), ; State v. Zornes, supra (concurrence of Caraway, J.).
State v. Smith 815 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Although we are mindful of the supreme court's holding in State v. Maise, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/15/02), , allowing for harmless error analysis when other sex crimes evidence is improperly admitted, we must conclude, as in Kennedy , that Smith's conviction of forcible rape in this case was prejudiced by the evidence pertaining to the alleged crimes and bad acts against C.S.
State v. Zornes 814 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Maise, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/15/02), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by