Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Flagg, 786 So. 2d 117.

24 citing documents.

State v. Cowans 251 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Salinas 251 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Ables 213 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Gant 209 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Baker 179 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
App. 5 Cir. 4/25/00), , unit denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), .
State v. Murphy 181 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), ); State v. Snavely, 99-1223 (La.App.
State v. Gross 145 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), ; State v. White, 98-91 (La.App.
State v. Keller 77 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 4/25/00), , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), , this Court held that “reasonable suspicion to justify an investigatory stop existed when [the officer] observed the defendant engage in what the officer believed was a hand-to-hand transaction,” even though the State presented no testimony that the officer could see what was exchanged.
State v. Johnson 52 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), , in which this Court found an experienced officer’s observation of an apparent hand-to-hand transaction, at night, in a high crime area with ongoing complaints of illegal activity, coupled with the defendant’s startled expression at the sight of police officers, gave rise to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
State v. Schnyder 10 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), , this court found that an experienced officer’s observation of an apparent hand-to-hand transaction that occurred at night in a high crime area, which was the subject of on-going complaints, and the defendant’s startled expression at the sight of police officers, gave rise to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
State v. Sam 988 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 4/25/00), , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), , this Court held that "reasonable suspicion to justify an investigatory stop existed when [the officer] observed the defendant engage in what the officer believed was a hand-to-hand transaction," even though the State presented no testimony indicating that the officer could see what was exchanged.
State v. McFarland 960 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), .
State v. Severin 958 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 4/25/00), , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), .
State v. Smith 947 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), , this Court held that an officer had reasonable suspicion to justify an investigatory stop after observing the defendant engage in what the officer believed was a hand-to-hand transaction.
State v. Chauvin 945 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Bolton 844 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), .
State v. Duquestrada 833 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), .
State v. Parfait 831 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , -528 , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), .
State v. Nelson 822 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX, State v. Snavely, 99-1223 (La.App.
State v. Graham 820 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5th Cir.4/25/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX
State v. London 815 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), .
State v. Brooks 807 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
5 Cir. 4/25/00), , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), In the present case, Defendant claims that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to support an investigatory stop because he had not committed any crime.
State v. Manson 791 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 4/25/00), , writ denied, 00-1510 (La.3/9/01), .
State v. Harris 786 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 4/25/00) , , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX, State v. Snavely, 99-1223 (La.App.