Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 800 So. 2d 790.

574 citing documents.

State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
See State v. State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/29/01), (construing La.
State v. Wyatt 821 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Withers 821 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
15:301.1(B), we will remand for resentencing as it relates to defendant's vehicle under the authority of the recent supreme court pronouncement in State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Legett 819 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
After reviewing the Supreme Court case of State v. Williams, 2000-1725 (La.11/28/01), , and the applicable statutory provisions, we held that where no minimum fine is provided by statute, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in omitting the fine, and no error patent existed.
State v. Esteen 821 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
However, we need not remand for correction as to the former because under State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/29/01), , and La.
State v. Everett 816 So. 2d 1272 La. 2002
State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/29/01), ; State ex rel.
State v. Neely 818 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
See, State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Paoli 818 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Rivers 817 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
article 882 and the Supreme Court's pronouncement in State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Dangerfield 816 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
There have been recent changes in the legislature which are encompassed in the Supreme Court decision State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX, (La.11/28/01), , that address the issue of illegally lenient sentencing.
State v. Williams 815 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Carr, 99-2209 (La.5/26/00), ; State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/29/01), .
State v. Barnes 816 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Moreover, in State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), , the Supreme Court has ruled that paragraph A self-activates the correction and eliminates the need to remand for a ministerial correction of an illegally lenient sentence, which may result from the failure of the sentencing court to impose punishment in conformity with that provided in the statute.
State v. Jefferson 815 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Rogers 812 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
However, in State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/29/01), , the Supreme Court ruled that under La.
State v. Hight 810 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
We have reviewed the sentence in accordance with State v. Williams , XXXX-XXXX (La.11/29/01), , a case which also involved a third offense DWI.
State v. Calvert 811 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Recently, in State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/29/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court announced that, "In instances where these [mandatory] restrictions are not recited at sentencing, La.
State v. Clemons 811 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
The Louisiana Supreme Court recently considered this issue and overruled Barroso in State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Gordon 809 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
In State v. Williams , XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/01), , this court found patent sentencing errors that were not covered by La.
State v. Butler 812 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[13] See State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Daniel 811 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
art. 882A, an illegally lenient sentence can be noticed or recognized by the appellate court sua sponte without the issue being raised by the State in State v. Williams, 2000-1725 (La.11/29/01), .
State v. Course 809 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
art. 882A, a illegally lenient sentence can be noticed or recognized by the appellate court sua sponte without the issue being raised by the State in State v. Williams, 2000-1725 (La.11/29/01), .
State v. Albercht 809 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
art. 882A, a illegally lenient sentence can be noticed or recognized by the appellate court sua sponte without the issue being raised by the State in State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/29/01), .
State v. Phillips 806 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
[2] Finding the evidence to adequately support the conviction, we affirm the conviction but remand for resentencing in light of State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/28/01), .
State v. Antoine 804 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
See also State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01): .