DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lipscomb, 807 So. 2d 218.

13 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Delon Quinell Swafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    1/25/02), and State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian M. Bonier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    State v. Lipscomb, 00-2836 (La.1/25/02), and State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02)
  • State v. Fields 120 So. 3d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Buhcannon 112 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1/25/02), (recognizing "the general preference for addressing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in post-conviction proceedings and not on appeal”).
  • State v. Montejo 40 So. 3d 952 La. 2010
    State v. Lipscomb, 00-2836 (La.1/25/02), and State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Henrietta Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Williams 953 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    See, e.g., State v. Watson, 00-1580 (La.5/14/02), , and State v. Lipscomb, 00-2836 (La.1/25/02), .
  • State v. Tran 919 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    See also, State v. Lipscomb, 00-2836 (La.1/25/02), (the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel claim relating to a trial counsel's failure to file a motion to suppress was more properly addressed in an application for post-conviction relief).
  • State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    See also, State v. Lipscomb, 00-2836 (La.1/25/02), (the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel claim relating to a trial counsel’s *984 failure to file a motion to suppress was more properly addressed in an application for post-conviction relief).
  • State v. Washington 866 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    See also, State v. Lipscomb, 00-2836 (La.1/25/02), (the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel claim relating to a trial counsel's *984 failure to file a motion to suppress was more properly addressed in an application for post-conviction relief).
  • State v. Sylvia 845 So. 2d 358 La. 2003
    Furthermore, this court has recently expressed approval of Spates and its progeny in State v. Lipscomb, 00-2836 (La.1/25/02), .
  • State v. Foster 828 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    This issue was recently addressed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Lipscomb, 2000-2836 (La.1/28/02), .
  • State v. Watson 817 So. 2d 81 La. 2002
    ANN. art. 703; State v. Lipscomb, 2000-2836, p. 1 (La.1/28/02), .