Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lewis, 815 So. 2d 818.

26 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. K.B. La. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Roosevelt T. Ardison La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Andrew Schlesinger AKA - Andrew Devon Schlesinger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
4/26/02), cert denied, 537 U.S. 922, 123 S.Ct.
State v. Moultrie 182 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
at 677 ; State v. Lewis, 00-3136 (La.4/26/02), .
State v. Robertson 136 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Lewis, 00-3136, p. 3 (La.4/26/02), , quoting Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 498 , 103 S.Ct.
State v. Jones 128 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The Supreme Court stated, “[h]eadlong flight-wherever it occurs-is the consummate act of evasion: It is not necessarily indicative of wrongdoing, but it is certainly suggestive of such.” *448 In State v. Lewis, 00-3136, p. 4 (La.4/26/02), (per cu-riam), cert, denied, 537 U.S. 922 , 123 S.Ct.
State v. Lampton 110 So. 3d 557 La. 2013
State v. Lewis, 00-3136, p. 3 (La.4/26/02), (“[L]aw enforcement officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment by merely approaching an individual on the street or in another public place, by asking him if he is willing to answer some questions, by putting questions to him if the person is willing to listen....
State v. Matthews 100 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
at p. 8, 79 So.3d at 956-957 ; State v. Lewis, 2000-3136, p. 5 (La.4/26/02), .
State v. Martin 79 So. 3d 951 La. 2011
y approaching an individual on the street or in another public place, by asking him if he is willing to answer some questions, by putting questions to him if the person is willing to listen, or by offering in evidence in a criminal prosecution his voluntary answers to such questions.”); Sylvester , 2001-0607, p. 4; 826 So.2d at 1108 (quoting Bostick); State v. Lewis, 2000-3136, p. 3 (La.4/26/02); , cert.
State v. Morgan 59 So. 3d 403 La. 2011
In State v. Lewis, we specifically held that, “the totality of the circumstances known to the officer at the time, including the residents’ complaints of drug activity, the ‘hot spot’ nature of the area, respondent’s nervousness, and, most importantly, his unprovoked headlong flight from the officer, gave rise to reasonable suspicion for an investigatory detention.” 00-3136 (La.4/26/02); (emphasis added); cert.
State v. Hamilton 36 So. 3d 209 La. 2010
" State v. Lewis, 00-3136, p. 4 (La.4/26/02), -821 (quoting Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 498 , 103 S.Ct.
State v. Alvarez 31 So. 3d 1022 La. 2010
is by no means novel; it has been endorsed by the Court any number of times.”); State v. Lewis, 00-3136 p. 3-4 (La.4/26/02), (citing Bostick).
State v. Butler 28 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Lewis, 00-3136, p. 3 (La.4/26/02), , cert.
State v. Thomas 8 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lewis, 00-3136, p. 4 (La.4/26/02), , cert.
State v. Alvarez 8 So. 3d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lewis, 00-3136, p. 3 (La.4/26/02), (per curiam), cert.
State v. HONORA 978 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4/26/02), (per curiam), cert.
State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See State v. Lewis, XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.4/26/02), , *1111 820 ("[T]he proposition that police officers can approach individuals as to whom they have no reasonable suspicion and ask them potentially incriminating questions.
State v. Vance 948 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Instead, the State cites State v. Lewis, 00-3136 (La.4/26/02), , to support its contention that the initial encounter was not an investigatory stop, but rather only a request by the officers that the Defendant come over to the police vehicle to speak with them "for a second," because he appeared nervous.
State v. Porche 943 So. 2d 335 La. 2006
2382, 2386 , 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991) and omitting citations); State v. Lewis, 00-3136, p. 3 (La.4/26/02), ("An officer's request for identification does not turn the encounter into a forcible detention unless the request is accompanied by an unmistakable show of official authority indicating to the person that he or she is not free to leave.") (citations omitted).
State v. Kelley 934 So. 2d 51 La. 2006
See also State v. Lewis, 00-3136, p. 3 (La.4/26/02), ("An officer's request for identification does not turn the encounter into a forcible detention unless the request is accompanied by an unmistakable show of official authority indicating to the person that he or she is not free to leave.") (citations omitted); State v. McDaniels, 01-0305, p. 1 (La.12/7/01), 803 S
State v. Sherman 931 So. 2d 286 La. 2006
1758, 1762 , 80 L.Ed.2d 247 (1984); State v. Lewis, XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.4/26/02), , cert.
State v. Sykes 900 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
ability to support an investigatory stop); see also State v. Jackson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/15/02), (no actual imminent stop when officers, acting on a tip, went to a residence, exited their car, stood at the fence to the residence and observed the defendant, who fit the description given in the tip, walk quickly up on the porch and abandon drugs); State v. Lewis, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/26/02), , cert.
State v. Malveaux 852 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
However, as the supreme court explained in State v. Lewis, 00-3136, pp. 3-4 (La.4/26/02), -821 , cert.
State v. Parfait 831 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Lewis, 00-3136, p. 4 (La.4/26/02), .
State v. Handy 828 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Likewise, in State v. Lewis, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/26/02), , the Court found no imminent actual stop where the officers walked up to the defendant and his companion and stood in their way while asking them for their identification.
State v. Dobard 824 So. 2d 1127 La. 2002
State v. Lewis, 00-3136, p. 3 (La.4/26/02), (quoting Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 498 , 103 S.Ct.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by