Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Walker, 799 So. 2d 461.

182 citing documents.

State v. Simpson 186 So. 3d 195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Walker, 2000-3200 (La.10/12/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Heller Marie Dupuis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
10/12/01), State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Ceasar James Williams -Aka- Ceaser James Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Williams 181 So. 3d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Terrance Mouton AKA Terrence Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
10/12/01), State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Glenn Von Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
10/12/01), State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.
State v. Mouton 175 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Finally, we note the supreme court’s repeated admonition “that sentence review under the Louisiana constitution does not provide an appellate court with a vehicle for substituting its judgment for that of a trial judge as to what punishment is more appropriate in a given case.” State v. Savoy, 11-1174, p. 5 (La.7/2/12), (citing State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01), ; State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), , cert.
State v. McClure 176 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2, (La.10/12/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Jared Paul Pontiff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
10/12/01), State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.
State v. Pontiff 166 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
| a,We further note the supreme court’s repeated admonition “that sentence review under the Louisiana constitution does not provide an appellate court with a vehicle for substituting its judgment for that of a trial judge as to what punishment is more appropriate in a given case[.]” State v. Savoy, 11-1174, p. 5 (La.7/2/12), (citing State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01), ; State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), ; ).
State v. Wilson 165 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Jasper, supra (citing State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ).
State v. Amant 169 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01), (per curiam).
State v. Rouser 158 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“On appellate review of a sentence, the relevant question is not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate but whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion.” State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 2002-737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), .
State v. Alverez 158 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Walker, 2000-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State of Louisiana v. John Boyd Baham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Waylon P. Sauls, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
10/12/01), State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.
State v. Sauls 149 So. 3d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Savoy, 11-1174, p. 5 (La.7/2/12), (citing State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01), ; State v. Cook, 95-2784 (La.5/31/96), ; and State v. Humphrey, 445" So.2d 1155 (La.
State v. Spencer 151 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Walker, [20]00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Jasper 149 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Lewis 147 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Quezada 141 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Walker, 2000-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 2002-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), .
State v. Wilmot 142 So. 3d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Laneheart 135 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Sta te Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 02-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), .
State v. Morales 133 So. 3d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The relevant question upon review of the sentence is “not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate but whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion.” State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 2002-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), .
State v. Williams 129 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Walker, 2000-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Sholar 136 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), , 462 ...
State v. Hamdalla 126 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Hackett 122 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 02-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), .
State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 02-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), ....
State v. Mills 120 So. 3d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 2002-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), .
State v. Marcelin 116 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Burton 116 So. 3d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Furthermore, pursuant to State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01) , while sentences must comply with La.Code Crim.
State v. Veal 116 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf State v. Phillips, 02-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), .
State v. Slattery 116 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 02-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), .
State v. Smith 108 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Sims 106 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
When | (¡reviewing a sentence, “the relevant question is not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate but whether the trial court abused its broad sentencing discretion.” State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Sipp 104 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Walker, 2000-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 2002-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), , 906 An appellate court reviewing a claim of excessive sentence must determine whether the trial court adequately complied with the statutory guidelines in La.C.Cr.P.
State of Louisiana v. Philip A. Geraci La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), ” See also State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01)
State v. Boudreaux 98 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State v. Savoy 93 So. 3d 1279 La. 2012
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; State v. Cook, 95-2784, p. 3 (La.5/31/96)
State v. Dauzart 89 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Walker, 2000-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 2002-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), .
State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 02-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), .
State v. Robinson 81 So. 3d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Walker, 00-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Garry Wayne McClinton, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), ” See also State v. Walker, 00- 3200 (La.10/12/01)
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Walker, 2000-3200, p. 2 (La.10/12/01), ; cf. State v. Phillips, 2002-0737, p. 1 (La.11/15/02), .
State v. Williams 76 So. 3d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated, however, that: Although La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Smith 71 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01), ; State v. Lewis, 09-783 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Draymond Paul Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Thomas, 98-1144 (La.10/9/98), ” See also State v. Walker, 00-3200 (La.10/12/01)