Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brisban, 809 So. 2d 923.

102 citing documents.

State v. Simmons 85 So. 3d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 851(3); State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 12 (La.2/26/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Rickey D. Arvie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
The Supreme Court of Louisiana has further explained that ―[e]xigent circumstances may arise from the need to prevent the offender‘s escape, minimize the possibility of a violent confrontation which could cause injury to the officers and the public, and preserve evidence from destruction or concealment.‖ State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 5 (La.2/26/02), emphasis added.
State v. Arvie 73 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The Supreme Court of Louisiana has further explained that “[ejxigent circumstances may arise from the need to prevent the offender’s escape, minimize the possibility of a violent confrontation which could cause injury to the officers and the public, and preserve evidence from destruction or concealment.” State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 5 (La.2/26/02), , emphasis added.
State v. Gipson 34 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Brisban, 2000-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Jones 33 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 8 (La.2/26/02), ; State v. Gilbert, 02-922, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Montgomery 31 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.02/26/02), .
State v. Wise 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Rejena S. Prosen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02)
State of Louisiana v. Johnathan L. Prosen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02)
State v. Prosen 19 So. 3d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Prosen 19 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Culp 17 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Brisban, 2000-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Nicholas 15 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Brisban, 2000-3437, p. 12 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Jones 999 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Brisban, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Simmons 996 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 5 (La.2/26/02), , emphasis added.
State v. Fournette 989 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Likewise, in State v. Brisban, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/26/02), , officers made a narcotics arrest at a residence next door to the apartment building where they later arrested the defendant.
State v. Berry 989 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. James 980 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Likewise, in State v. Brisban, 2000-3437 (La.2/26/02), , officers made a narcotics arrest at a residence next door to the apartment building where they later arrested the defendant.
State v. Smith 960 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Hemphill, 41,526 (La.App.2d Cir.11/17/06), , citing State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.02/26/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Henrietta Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams 953 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Wallace 950 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.02/26/02), .
State v. Hemphill 942 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Brumfield 944 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Evans 926 So. 2d 498 La. 2006
See State v. Brisban, 2000-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Doussan 924 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
1371 , 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980) ]; State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 5 (La.2/26/02), -928 .
State v. Persley 918 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
The remaining question, then, turns on whether the evidence would have likely produced a different verdict in the event of retrial under the guise of State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Stephens 917 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Ledford 914 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Brisban, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/26/02)
State v. Shumaker 914 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Shane Everet Evans La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/2/04), -63, explained exigent circumstances as follows: With regard to warrantless searches, the supreme court has held in State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), : Warrantless entries into the home for arrest or seizure are invalid in the absence of exigent circumstances.
State v. Evans 908 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/2/04), -63 , explained exigent circumstances as follows: With regal’d to warrantless searches, the supreme court has held in State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), , 927: Warrantless entries into the home for arrest or seizure are invalid in the absence of exigent circumstances.
State v. Haywood 907 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
art. 851(3); State v. Brisban, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.2/26/02), ; State v. Bright, 98-0398, pp. 25-26 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Brown 902 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 5 (La.2/26/02), ; State v. Temple, 01-655, p. 11 (La.App.
State v. Hill 877 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.02/26/02), ; State v. Blanchard, 99-3439 (La.01/18/01), ; State v. Manning, supra .
State of Louisiana v. Kenry James Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
2/26/02), : Warrantless entries into the home for arrest or seizure are invalid in the absence of exigent circumstances.
State v. Lewis 878 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
With regard to warrantless searches, the supreme court has held in State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), , 927: Warrantless entries into the home for arrest or seizure are invalid in the absence of exigent circumstances.
State v. Onstead 875 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
[8] See, State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02)
State v. Manning 868 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.02/26/02), ; State v. Blanchard, 99-3439 (La.01/18/01), ; State v. Sandifer, 95-2226 (La.09/05/96), .
State v. Goldston 868 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
art. 851(3); State v. Brisban, 2000-3437, p. 12 (La.2/26/02), ; State v. Bright, 98-0398, pp. 25-26 (La.4/11/00), 776 So.2d *206 1134, 1149 .
State v. Chisley 860 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Fisher 852 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 8 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Malveaux 852 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 5 (La.2/26/02), , citing Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 , 85 S.Ct.
State v. Price 842 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
art. 851(3); State v. Brisban, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.2/26/02), ; State v. Bright, 98-0398, pp. 25-26 (La.4/11/00), .
State v. Marshall 841 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 8 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Gilbert 839 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Brisban, 00-3437, p. 8 (La.2/26/02), ; State v. Quest, 00-205, p. 21 (La.App.
State v. Watts 835 So. 2d 441 La. 2003
See State v. Brisban, XXXX-XXXX, p. 12 (La.2/26/02), ; State v. Bright, 98-0398, p. 26 (La.4/11/00), ; -736 (La.1984).
Pepper v. Triplet 834 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Brisban, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Quiambao 833 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Brisban, 00-3437 (La.2/26/02), .
State v. Woods 830 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
art. 851(3); State v. Brisban, 2000-3437, p. 12 (La.2/26/02), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by