Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kirk, 833 So. 2d 418.
- State of Louisiana v. Kevin Dupart La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
- State v. Everett 156 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/13/02), writ denied 02-3079 (La.5/9/03), (citing Roska v. Peterson, 304 F.3d 982 (10th Cir.2002), abrogated in part on other grounds, 328 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir.2003)).
-
State v. Lee
124 So. 3d 1282
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/13/02) , , writ denied 02-3079 (La.5/9/03), , (citing Roska v. Peterson, 304 F.3d 982 (10th Cir.2002), abrogated in part on other grounds, 328 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir.2003)).
-
State v. Lewis
126 So. 3d 652
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/13/02) , , this court found no exigent circumstances because the officers’ detention of the buyer |lsof drugs occurred a block away from the apartment where he bought them, and there was no evidence that there was anyone on the scene of the detention who could have alerted anyone inside the residence.
-
State v. Fournette
989 So. 2d 199
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 11/13/02), , officers conducting a surveillance observed four suspected drug transactions from the defendant's apartment, at least one of which involved the defendant.
-
State v. James
980 So. 2d 769
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 11/13/02) , State v. Jones, 2002-1931, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
- State v. Doussan 924 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Shane Everet Evans
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 11/13/02), writ denied, 02-3079 (La.5/9/03), (citing Roska v. Peterson, 304 F.3d 982 (10th Cir.2002), abrogated in part on other grounds, 328 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir.2003)).
-
State v. Evans
908 So. 2d 1201
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 11/13/02) , , writ denied, 02-3079 (La.5/9/03), , (citing Roska v. Peterson, 304 F.3d 982 (10th Cir.2002), abrogated in part on other grounds, 328 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir.2003)).
-
State of Louisiana v. Kenry James Lewis
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 11/13/02), writ denied 02-3079 (La.
-
State v. Lewis
878 So. 2d 758
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 11/13/02) , , writ denied 02-3079 (La.5/9/03), , (citing Roska v. Peterson, 304 F.3d 982 (10th Cir.2002), abrogated in part on other grounds, 328 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir.2003)).
-
State v. Wright
850 So. 2d 778
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 11/13/02) , this court found because the defendant remained in his apartment after police officers observed several drug transactions during a surveillance there were insufficient exigent circumstances to justify a warrantless entry into the apartment where the drug transactions occurred.