Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Miller, 792 So. 2d 104.

23 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Antoine Edwards La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
4 Cir. 7/25/01), (La.App.
State v. Bibbins 258 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 7/25/01), , 111.
State v. Cretian 238 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 7/25/01) , , 116 and State v. Fazande , 05-901, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. Welsh 196 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
4th Cir.07/25/01), , writ denied, 01-2420 (La.06/21/02), .
State v. Ellis 190 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. King 186 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 7/25/01), ,115 n. 4; Holmes, 99 -0898, at p. 7, 791 So.2d at 694 (on rehearing).
State v. Mercadel 120 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 7/25/01), ; (La.App.
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 7/25/01), -111 , this Court discussed the Strickland two-part test relating to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim stating that the defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficiency prejudiced the defendant.
State v. George 108 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Landfair 70 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 7/25/01) , ; State v. Thompson, 98-0988 (La.App.
State v. Colvin 65 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Johnson 41 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Reginald J. Julien La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 7/25/01), -16, writ denied, 01-2420 (La.
State v. Julien 34 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 7/25/01), , *499 115-16, writ denied, 01-2420 (La.6/21/02), (emphasis added), held: “General intent” exists when circumstances indicate that the prohibited result may reasonably be expected to follow from the offender’s voluntary act, irrespective of any subjective desire on the offender’s part to have accomplishe
State v. Allen 30 So. 3d 1024 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State in the Interest of D. A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 7/25/01), -115, writ denied, 01-2420 (La.6/21/02), the Fourth Circuit was faced with the issue of a defendant who proceeded to trial with joint representation without being advised of his right to separate representation pursuant to LSA-C.Cr.P.
State ex rel. D. A. 995 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 7/25/01) , -115 , writ denied, 01-2420 (La.6/21/02), , the Fourth Circuit was faced with the issue of a defendant who proceeded to trial with joint representation without being advised of his right to separate representation pursuant to LSA-C.Cr.P.
State Ex Rel. Da 995 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 7/25/01) , -115 , writ denied, 01-2420 (La.6/21/02), , the Fourth Circuit was faced with the issue of a defendant who proceeded to trial with joint representation without being advised of his right to separate representation pursuant to LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Jochum 982 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
App. 4 Cir.7/25/01), , this court noted: A defendant who receives a sentence in conformity with a plea agreement set forth in the record at the time of the plea is prohibited from seeking review of the sentence.
State v. Roberts 864 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 7/25/01) , -115 , writ denied, 01-2420 (La.6/21/02), , the Fourth Circuit was faced with the issue of a defendant who proceeded to trial with joint representation without being advised of his right to separate representation pursuant to LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. Jackson 860 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
4 Cir.7/25/01), , writ denied, 01-2420 (La.6/21/02), .
State v. Jefferson 834 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 7/25/01), , writ denied, 2001-2420 (La.6/21/02), ; State v. Thompson, 98-0988 (La.App.
State v. Francis 809 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 7/25/01), , this Court discussed the two-part test relating to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim: |1?A defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is to be assessed by the two-part test of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.