Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rodriguez, 781 So. 2d 640.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Hugh Gilliam La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 2/14/01), State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.
State v. Spencer 151 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 2/14/01) , ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.App.
State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/14/01) , ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.App.
State v. Veal 116 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/14/01) , , wherein this Court noted that the failure to file a motion to reconsider sentence or object to the sentence does not preserve an excessive sentence claim.
State v. McCarthy 112 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/14/01) , ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.App.
State v. Winston 100 So. 3d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1124 Cir. 2/14/01), ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.App.
State v. Armstead 98 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 2/14/01), ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.App.
State v. Phillips 61 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 2/14/01), ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667, p. 14 (La.App.
State v. Summers 52 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 2/14/01), ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.App.
State v. Jenkins 45 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Every 35 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 2/14/01) , ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.App.
State v. Duncan 15 So. 3d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 2/14/01) , State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.App.
State v. Latin 960 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Alexander 958 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 2/14/01), ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667, p. 14 (La.App.
State v. Wilson 956 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 2/14/01), ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.App.
State v. Batiste 947 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 2/14/01), ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.App.
Distinguished State v. Everett 916 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Distinguished State of Louisiana v. Jamey L. Everett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Stewart 909 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 2/14/01), ; State v. Tyler, 98-1667 (La.App.
State v. Odle 834 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 2/14/01) , ; State v. Monette, 99-1870 (La.App.
State v. Thompson 806 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 2/14/01) , -649 , this Court considered a similar argument and set out the following standard: “As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are more properly raised by application for post conviction relief in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing may be conducted if warranted.” State v. Howard
State v. Brown 804 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001