Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Watts, 835 So. 2d 441.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen McPhearson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jameel D. Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Frank Kang La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
1/14/03), the court considered the defendant’s newly discovered evidence claim meritorious but it still stated, “It is appropriate to be skeptical when newly discovered evidence is offered after a trial.
State of Louisiana v. Manuel Dukes La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
1/14/03), the Court held that a trial court should ascertain on a motion for new trial 18 “whether there is new material fit for a new jury’s judgment.
State v. Davis 273 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
1/14/03), this court held that a trial court should ascertain on a motion for new trial “whether there is new material fit for a new jury’s judgment.” The only issue is “whether the result will probably be different.” Id.
State of Louisiana v. Quincy McKinnies, Jr. 171 So. 3d 861 La. 2014
State v. Watts, 2000-0602, p. 6 (La.1/14/03); , citing also State v. Cavalier, 1996-3052, 1997-0103, p. 3 (La.10/31/97)
State v. Thomas 131 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v.Watts, 2000-0602, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Quang T. Do 130 So. 3d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
More recently, in State v. Watts, 00-0602 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court expanded on this definition, stating: The test is objective in that the trial judge does not sit as the ultimate arbiter of the resolution of the case once the new evidence is considered, that is, the trial court does not weigh the evidence.
State v. Guillory 45 So. 3d 612 La. 2010
State v. Watts, 2000-0602, p. 9 (La.1/14/03), n. 8 .
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Jude Gilbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
1/14/03), (citation omitted).
State v. Gilbert 41 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Watts, 00-602, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), (citation omitted).
State v. Vallier 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
1/14/03), , we quoted the above passage with approval and added: The test is objective in that the trial judge does not sit as the ultimate arbiter of the resolution of the case once the new evidence is considered, that is, the trial court does not weigh the evidence.
State of Louisiana v. Carey Vallier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
1/14/03), we quoted the above passage with approval and added: The test is objective in that the trial judge does not sit as the ultimate arbiter of the resolution of the case once the new evidence is considered, that is, the trial court does not weigh the evidence.
State v. Spring 30 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1/14/03), -49 , the supreme court noted: When ruling on an Article 851(3) motion, a trial judge's duty is not to weigh the new evidence as though he were a jury deciding guilt or innocence or to determine what is true or false in light of the additional information.
State v. Coleman 959 So. 2d 465 La. 2007
More recently, in State v. Watts, 00-0602 (La.1/14/03), , we quoted the above passage with approval and added: The test is objective in that the trial judge does not sit as the ultimate arbiter of the resolution of the case once the new evidence is considered, that is, the trial court does not weigh the evidence.
State v. Singleton 953 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
art. 851(3); State v. Watts, 00-602(La.1/14/03)
State of Louisiana v. Justin Charles Singleton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Smith 936 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
2d 861 (La.1980) ( on rehearing ), cited with approval in State v. Watts, 00-0602 (La.1/14/03), , the supreme court stated: The scope of the trial judge's duty toward the motion for a new trial based upon the new evidence must be kept in mind.
State v. Persley 918 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
The analysis of the Motion for New Trial in a criminal case based upon newly discovered evidence was recently considered by the supreme court in State v. Watts, 00-0602 (La.1/14/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Elbertine Demery Sykes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Sykes 857 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Watts, 00-602, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .