Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Neal, 796 So. 2d 649.

535 citing documents.

State v. Wilson 900 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Wayne Wilson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Hopkins 897 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Neal, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Jetton, 32,893 (La.App.
State v. Videau 900 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 9 (La.6/29/01), , cert denied, 535 U.S. 940 , 122 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
6/29/01); stated: As a general matter, when the key issue is the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator, rather than whether the crime was committed, the state is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification.
State v. Hood 895 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 2/5/03), -47 , writ denied, 03-886 (La.11/7/03), , this court quoted the supreme court as follows: The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01); , stated: As a general matter, when the key issue is the defendant's identity as the perpetrator, rather than whether the crime was committed, the state is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification.
State v. Pitre 893 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Neal, 00-0674, (La.6/29/01) ().
State of Louisiana v. Kevin James Pitre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Under this standard, the appellate court “must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Neal, 00-0674, (La.6/29/01) ().
State v. Martin 895 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), , cert.
State v. Anderson 889 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. William L. Giles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
11/7/03), this court quoted the supreme court as follows: The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01); stated: As a general matter, when the key issue is the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator, rather than whether the crime was committed, the state is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification.
State v. Giles 884 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 2/5/03), -47 , writ denied, 03-886 (La.11/7/03), , this court quoted the supreme court as follows: The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01); , stated: As a general matter, when the key issue is the defendant's identity as the perpetrator, rather than whether the crime was committed, the state is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification.
State v. Severin 885 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
*615 State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 9 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
State v. Neal, 00-0674, (La.6/29/01) ().
State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
This Court affirmed his conviction and death sentence in State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), , cert.
State v. Hartwell 866 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Poullard 863 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), , cert.
State v. Robicheaux 865 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Evans 864 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 11 (La.6/29/01), , cert.
State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
d 1089, 1110 ; State v. Irish, 00-2086, p. 8 (La.1/15/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-0991, p. 19 (La.5/15/01), ; State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 38 (La.10/16/01), ; State v. Deruise, 98-0541, p. 37 (La.4/3/01), ; State v. Deal, 00-0434, p. 16 (La.11/29/01), ; State v. Neal, 00-0674, pp. 16-17 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Bradley 858 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
United States v. Osum, 943 F.2d 1394, 1405 (5th Cir. 1991); State v. Neal, 00-674 (La.6/29/01), , cert.
State v. Jackson 846 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
In State v. Neal, 00-674 (La.6/29/01), , reh’g denied by, clarified by, 00-674 (La.9/21/01), , cert.
State v. Williams 846 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), .
State v. Jones 839 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01); , stated: As a general matter, when the key issue is the defendant's identity as the perpetrator, rather than whether the crime was committed, the state is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification.
State v. Page 837 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), , cert.
State v. Stokes 828 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Owens, 30,903 (La.App.2d Cir.9/25/98), , writ denied, 98-2723 (La.2/5/99), .
State v. Willis 823 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Davis, 27,961 (La.App.
State v. Taylor 821 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Owens, 30,903 (La.
State v. Mitchell 818 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Neal, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/01), ; cert.
State v. Zeno 811 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
A similar situation arose in State v. Neal, 00-0674, p. 8 (La.6/29/01); , 656-57 wherein the supreme court reasoned: As to Jurors Eckles and Hawkins, the trial court rendered the question of whether defense counsel had established a prima facie case of discrimination moot when it asked the prosecutor for his race-neutral reasons for qualifying the jurors.
State v. Jarvis 811 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Neal, XXXX-XXXX, p. 23 (La.6/29/01), , see also La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Wilson 806 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01); .
State v. Payne 806 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01); ; State v. Rowan, 97-21 (La.App.
State v. Jones 799 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
State v. Neal, 00-674, p. 6 (La.6/29/01); .