Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bright, 809 So. 2d 1112.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Carlos M. Smith La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 2/6/02), -17, writ denied, 02-0698 (La.
State v. Williams 265 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 2/6/02), , 1117.
State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Pernell 127 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Molere 99 So. 3d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 6/29/95) , ; State v. Bright, 00-1255 (La.App.2/6/02), ; State v. Lewis, 95-0769 (La.App.
State v. Higginbotham 60 So. 3d 621 La. 2011
State v. Massey 51 So. 3d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 2/6/02), (finding record inadequate, given “[t]he cumulative effect of the missing portions of testimony of the defendant and other material witnesses, and the frequency of ‘inaudible’ and ‘spelled phonetically’ in the transcript”); State v. Diggs, 93-0324 (La.App.
State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 2/6/02), (finding record inadequate, given “[t]he cumulative effect of the missing portions of testimony of the defendant and other material witnesses, and the frequency of ‘inaudible’ and ‘spelled phonetically’ in the transcript”); State v. Diggs, 93-0324 (La.App.
State v. Hughes 951 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 2/6/02) , (the trial transcript containing numerous mistakes and omissions not sufficient for review).
State v. Scott 913 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 2/6/02), (finding record inadequate, given "[t]he cumulative effect of the missing portions of testimony of the defendant and other material witnesses, and the frequency of `inaudible' and `spelled phonetically' in the transcript"); State v. Diggs, 93-0324 (La.App.
State v. Boatner 861 So. 2d 149 La. 2003
4 Cir. 2/6/02), , writ denied, 02-0698 (La.11/1/02), , the court found the cumulative effect of the omissions rendered the record inadequate.
State v. Walker 844 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Young 839 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 2/6/02), (finding record inadequate given "[t]he cumulative effect of the missing portions of testimony of the defendant and other material witnesses, and the frequency of `inaudible' and `spelled phonetically' in the transcript"); State v. Diggs, 93-0324 (La.App.
Followed State v. Boatner 844 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 2/6/02), , finding that the accumulative effect of the omissions renders the record inadequate.
State v. Simpson 829 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 2/6/02), (finding record inadequate given "[t]he cumulative effect of the missing portions of testimony of the defendant and other material witnesses, and the frequency of `inaudible' and `spelled phonetically' in the transcript"); State v. Diggs, 93-0324 (La.App.
In Re Hunter 823 So. 2d 325 La. 2002
State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 2/6/02), (finding record inadequate given "[t]he cumulative effect of the missing portions of testimony of the defendant and other material witnesses, and the frequency of `inaudible' and `spelled phonetically' in the transcript"); State v. Diggs, 93-0324 (La.App.