Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ball, 824 So. 2d 1089.

61 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Levi Joseph Garrick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Garrick 879 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    State v. Ball, 00-2277 (La.1/25/02), , cert.
  • State v. Garrick 879 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    The mere fact that a prospective juror has stated an opinion that is prejudicial to the defense is not in itself sufficient to warrant a challenge for cause if a further inquiry demonstrates the prospective juror’s “ability and willingness to decide the Lease impartially according to the law and evidence.” State v. Ball, 00-2277 (La.1/25/02), , cert.
  • State v. Taylor 875 So. 2d 58 La. 2004
    See e.g., State v. Ball, 00-2277 (La.1/25/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Taylor, 99-1131 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Anthony, 98-0406 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660 (La.1/4/94), -81 .
  • State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
    State v. Ball, 00-2277 (La 1/25/02), , cert.
  • State v. Carmouche 872 So. 2d 1020 La. 2003
    See, e.g., State v. Ball, 00-2277, p. 7 (La.1/25/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659, p. 4 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Taylor, 99-1131, p. 6 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Anthony, 98-0406, p. 22 (La.4/11/00), ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Robertson, 92-2660, pp. 2-3 (La.1
  • State v. Price 842 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    State v. Ball, 2000-2277, p. 12 (La.1/25/02), , cert.
  • State v. Shepherd 839 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Ball, 00-2277, p. 5 (La.1/25/02), .
  • State v. Taylor 838 So. 2d 729 La. 2003
    [16] See, e.g., State v. Ball, 00-2277 (La.1/25/02), (patron robbed bar and killed beer delivery man in the course); State v. Anthony, 98-0406 (La.4/11/00), (ex-employee returned to restaurant, shot four employees during armed robbery, killing three); State v. Wessinger, 98-1234 (La.5/28/99), , cert.
  • Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd. 831 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    As such, we turn to State v. Ball, 00-2277 (La.1/25/02); , which sets out the standard of review on this matter.
  • State v. Randall 830 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Ball, 2000-2277 (La.01/25/02), ; State v. Hills, 379 So.2d at 743-44 .