DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hair, 784 So. 2d 1269.

22 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.H. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
  • The Cartesian Company, Inc. and Greg Gachassin v. the Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board Panel a … La. 2023
  • State Of Louisiana v. William Wayne Lee, Jr. La. 2023
    5/15/01), (defendant filed a motion to quash claiming the statute defining the offense alleged was unconstitutionally vague); (La.
  • The Cartesian Company, Inc. and Greg Gachassin v. The Louisiana Board of Ethics La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Calvin Duhon -Aka- Michael C. Duhon -Aka- Michael Duhon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
  • State v. Jones 182 So. 3d 1218 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
    State v. Hair, 00-2694 (La.5/15/01), .
  • Morales v. Parish of Jefferson 140 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    00-2694 (La.5/15/01), (internal citations omitted).
  • State ex rel. L.C. 126 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    argues that the statute is void for vagueness as it fails to provide sufficient notice to enable ordinary people to understand what conduct it prohibits, hciting State v. Hair, 00-2694, p. 7 (La.5/15/01), .
  • State v. Pearson 975 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    14:3; State v. Hair, 00-2694, p. 7 (La.5/15/01), .
  • State v. Hines 970 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    14:3; State v. Hair, 00-2694 (La.5/15/01), .
  • State v. LONZO 960 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Hair, 00-2694 (La.5/15/01), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Henrietta Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    [a] defendant [therefore] may not establish that a statute is unconstitutionally vague by speculating about hypothetical conduct which could also be prosecuted under the same statute.” State v. Hair, 00-2694, p. 5 (La.5/15/01), ) (citing State v. Boyd, 97-0579, p. 2 (La.4/14/98), ) (“[A] vagueness challenge to a statute must be examined in the light of the facts of the 16 case .
  • State v. Williams 953 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Hair, 00-2694, p. 5 (La.5/15/01), ) (citing State v. Boyd, 97-0579, p. 2 (La.4/14/98), ) ("[A] vagueness challenge to a statute must be examined in the light of the facts of the case .
  • State v. Spears 940 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Hair, 2000-2694 (La.5/15/01), .
  • State v. Ruffins 940 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    [1] In State v. Hair, 00-2694 (La.5/15/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the applicable law regarding statutes challenged as unconstitutionally vague: In determining the constitutionality of a statute, we must follow the basic rules of statutory construction.
  • State v. Lande 934 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    [6] State v. Hair, 00-2694 (La.5/15/01), .
  • State v. Wright 931 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Hair, 2000-2694 (La.05/15/01), .
  • Arrington v. Arrington 930 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    See, State v. Hair, 00-2694 (La.5/15/01), .
  • State v. Shumaker 914 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    * * * In State v. Hair, 00-2694 (La.5/15/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the applicable law with regards to challenges to statutes as being unconstitutionally vague: In determining the constitutionality of a statute, we must follow the basic rules of statutory construction.
  • State v. Fields 877 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    14:3; State v. Lam, 36,862 (La.App.2d Cir.02/11/2003), , writ denied, 2003-0945 (La.10/03/03), ; State v. Hair, 2000-2694 (La.05/15/2001), .
  • State v. Interiano 868 So. 2d 9 La. 2004
    State v. Hair, 00-2694, p. 5 (La.5/15/01), ) (citing State v. Boyd, 97-0579, p. 2 (La.4/14/98), ) ("[A] vagueness challenge to a statute must be examined in the light of the facts of the case ...
  • State v. Lam 837 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Applicable Law In State v. Hair, 2000-2694 (La.5/15/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the applicable law with regards to challenges to statutes as being unconstitutionally vague: In determining the constitutionality of a statute, we must follow the basic rules of statutory construction.