Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bowie, 813 So. 2d 377.

24 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Press Shorter, III La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State v. McMasters 251 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4/3/02), , 381 (noting that "blunts," are "cigars with marijuana cores"); State v. Moran , 47,804, p. 3 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Ferdinand 107 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Bowie, 2000-3344 (La.04/03/02), .
State v. Hugle 104 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bowie, 00-3344 p. 9 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Dorsey 94 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
It is well-settled that a witness’s “hope or knowledge that he will receive leniency from the State is highly relevant to establish bias or interest.” Wiley, supra (citing, State v. Bowie, 00-3344, p. 10 (La.4/3/02), , cert, denied, 537 U.S. 951 , 123 S.Ct.
State v. Paul 90 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bowie, 2000-3344, p. 10 (La.4/30/02), .
State v. Johnson 91 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
15 It is well-settled that a witness’s “hope or knowledge that he will receive leniency from the state is highly relevant to establish bias or interest.” State v. Bowie, 2000-3344 (La.4/3/02), , cert.
State v. Wiley 68 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
It is well-settled that a witness’s “hope or knowledge that he will receive leniency from the state is highly relevant to establish bias or interest.” State v. Bowie, 2000-3344, p. 10 (La.4/3/02), , cert.
State ex rel. L.R. 52 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Likewise, “[a] | ^defendant's right to demonstrate facts and circumstances which might influence the witness’s perceptions or color his testimony, thereby lessening the weight the fact-finder might accord his testimony, is guaranteed in both state and federal criminal proceedings and is an important function of the right to confront and cross-examine.” State v. Bowie, 2000-3344 p. 9 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
See Draughn, supra; Bridgewater, supra ; Jacobs, supra; State v. Bowie, 00-3344 (La.4/3/02), , cert.
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
Defendant's challenge is based on this Court's pronouncement in State v. Bowie, 00-3344, (La.4/3/02), , which recognized that: "This Court has never explicitly addressed the validity of the victim's age as a factor elevating a killing to first degree murder or as an aggravating circumstance supporting imposition of the death penalty."
State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
See e.g., State v. Bowie, 00-3344 (La.4/3/02), (defendant robbed victim over the age of 70 and strangled him with his shoelaces and an electrical cord); State v. Cosey, 97-2020 (La.11/28/00), (defendant raped and slashed throat of 12-year-old victim, stomping her face as he left); State v. Miller, 99-0192 (La.9/6/00), (defendant robbed
State v. Brown 907 So. 2d 1 La. 2005
See, e.g., State v. Bowie, 00-3344 (La.4/3/02), ; State v. Broaden, 99-2124 (La.2/21/01), ; State v. Wessinger, 98-1234 (La.5/28/99), , cert.
State v. Harris 892 So. 2d 1238 La. 2005
State v. Bowie, 00-3344 p. 28 (La.4/3/02), -396 , cert.
State v. Taylor 888 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
See also, State v. Bowie, 00-3344 (La.4/3/02), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Kiley M. Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
(collecting cases); see also State v. Bowie, 00-3344, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ("A defendant's right to demonstrate facts and circumstances which might influence the witness's perceptions or color his testimony, thereby lessening the weight the fact-finder might accord his testimony, is guaranteed in both state and federal criminal proceedings and is an important fun
State v. Williams 878 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
(collecting cases); see also State v. Bowie, 00-3344, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ("A defendant's right to demonstrate facts and circumstances which might influence the witness's perceptions or color his testimony, thereby lessening the weight the fact-finder might accord his testimony, is guaranteed in both state and federal criminal proceedings and is an important function of the right to co
State v. Legrand 864 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
State v. Bowie, 00-3344 (La.4/3/02), , cert.
State v. Royal 857 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1105 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); State v. Bowie, 00-3344 (La.4/30/02), , cert.
State v. Glosson 843 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Recently, the court in State v. Bowie, 2000-3344 (La.4/3/01), noted: In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 844 So. 2d 832 La. 2003
(collecting cases); see also State v. Bowie, 00-3344, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ("A defendant's right to demonstrate facts and circumstances which might influence the witness's perceptions or color his testimony, thereby lessening the weight the fact-finder might accord his testimony, is guaranteed in both state and federal criminal proceedings and is an important function of the right to co
State v. Williams 842 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Citing Davillier , in State v. Bowie, XXXX-XXXX, p. 23 (La.4/3/02), , the court likewise found that forcibly moving the victim from one room to another within the same structure was insufficient to establish that a forcible seizing and carrying "from one place to another" had occurred.
State v. Jones 841 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
1105 , 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); State v. Bowie, 00-3344, p. 10 (La.4/30/02), , cert.