Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hoffman, 768 So. 2d 592.

25 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Cooper, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Marshall J. Alexander, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Jared Diaz La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State v. Brown 223 So. 3d 88 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Green 211 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
6/14/00), (per curiam), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
6/14/00), (per curiam), cert.
State of Louisiana v. Odeal Pippins Lirette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Lirette 195 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
On the issue of the recordation of bench conferences, the supreme court in State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, pp. 49-50 (La.4/11/00), -87 , (footnote omitted) (citations omitted), supplemented, 00-1609 (La.6/14/00), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Cornelius Eugene Wilson AKA N.O. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
6/23/00), the supreme court found that, where the defendant was charged with capital murder and ultimately pled guilty to second degree murder, the trial court‟s failure to advise the defendant, as part of the plea colloquy required by La.Code Crim.
State v. Wilson 157 So. 3d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Further, in State v. Gross, 99-3534, p. 1 (La.6/23/00), , the supreme court found that, where the defendant was charged with capital murder and ultimately pled guilty to second degree murder, the trial court’s failure to advise the defendant, as part of the plea colloquy required by La.Code Crim.
State v. Gregoire 143 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), , opinion supplemented by, 2000-1609 (La.6/14/00), (per curiam), cert, denied, 531 U.S. 946 , 121 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Paul B. Stephan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/23/00), -93, the supreme court issued the following ruling regarding a similar violation of La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Stephan 79 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
*1180 ^HARMLESS ERROR In State v. Gross, 99-3534 (La.6/23/00), -93 , the supreme court issued the following ruling regarding a similar violation of La.Code Crim.P.
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Hoffman, 98-3 118, pp. 49-50 (La.4/11/00), , opinion supplemented by, 00-1609 (La.6/14/00), , the Court interpreted article 843⅛ requirement that “objections” and “arguments” be recorded “as normally applying only to objections made in open court and the arguments of counsel in closing, because only these objections and arguments rise to a level of materiality sufficient to invoke Article 843.” Id., p. 50, 7
State v. Carter 75 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), , opinion supplemented, 00-1609 (La.6/14/00), , cert.
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
Opinion supplemented by State v. Hoffman, 00-1609 (La.6/14/00), , and certiorari denied by Hoffman v. Louisiana, 531 U.S. 946 , 121 S.Ct.
State v. Trosclair 34 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
6/14/00), (per curiam), cert, denied, 531 U.S. 946 , 121 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Bryan Means La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Means 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. George 19 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), , opinion supplemented 00-1609 (La.6/14/00), , cert.
State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, p. 48 (La.4/11/00), , opinion supplemented, 00-1609 (La.6/14/00), , cert.
State v. Lang 960 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00), -1609 (La.6/14/00), , U.S. cert.
State v. Johnson 957 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
[5] Opinion supplemented, 00-1609 (La.6/14/00), , cert.
State v. Saltzman 843 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
probable cause for a warrantless arrest exists when facts and circumstances known to an arresting officer, and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient to justify a man of ordinary caution in believing that the person to be arrested has committed a crime.” State v. Hoffman, 98-3118 (La.4/11/00); , opinion amended on other grounds, 00-1609 (La.6/14/00); , cert.
State v. Elledge 797 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
See also State v. Gross, 99-3534 (La.6/23/00); , wherein the supreme court found it unreasonable to conclude that the failure to advise the defendant of the element of specific intent would have affected his decision to plead guilty, accepting a life sentence, instead of proceeding to trial and possibly being sentenced to death.