Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Olivieri v. State, 779 So. 2d 735.

123 citing documents.

State v. Collins 125 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), , and Smith v. State, 10-1140 (La.1/24/12), .
State ex rel. A.N. 123 So. 3d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172, p. 24 (La.2/21/01), (concluding that Louisiana’s Megan’s Law is remedial and/or regulatory rather than punitive).
State v. Anderson 121 So. 3d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172 (La.2/21/01) ).
State v. Lodge 116 So. 3d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172, 2000-1767 (La.2/21/01), , (analyzing both clauses).
State v. Clark 117 So. 3d 1246 La. 2013
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01); .
State of Louisiana v. Darryl James Theriot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Price 156 So. 3d 68 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172 (La.2/21/01), ; State v. Hunter, 36,692 (La.App.
State v. I.C.S. 110 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172 (La.2/21/01), , the court dealt with a claim that La.
State v. Terry 108 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), : In the absence of a statute of limitations, the State retains the right to prosecute for crimes indefinitely.
State of Louisiana v. Randolph Marinoni La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Marinoni 101 So. 3d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The State responded by stating that the amendments to the sex offender registration statutes apply retroactively to include the date Defendant was convicted of simple rape, and further explaining that the supreme court has already rejected Defendant’s ex post facto argument in Olivieri v. State, 00-172 (La.2/21/01), .
State v. Billiot 104 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172 (La.2/21/01), , cert.
State v. Odom 104 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.02/21/01), ; State v. Hunter, 36,692 (La.App.2d Cir.12/20/02), .
Holmes v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections 93 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172 (La.2/21/01), , cert.
State v. Odoms 94 So. 3d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172 (La.2/21/01), , cert denied, 533 U.S. 936 , 121 S.Ct.
State v. Trosclair 89 So. 3d 340 La. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172, p. 15-16 (La.2/21/01), (noting Louisiana’s constitutional prohibition against the enactment of ex post facto laws is not only patterned after the United States Constitution, but mandated by it), cert, denied, Olivieri v. Louisiana, 533 U.S. 936 , 121 S.Ct.
State v. Nye 89 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), .
State v. Anderson 91 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172 (La.2/21/01) , the Louisiana Supreme Court rejected the defendant’s argument that the application of a time period for instituting prosecution, which was extended after the commission of the charged offense, violated the ex post facto provisions of the United States and Louisiana Constitutions.
State v. Shell 87 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172 (La.2/21/01), ; State v. Hunter, 36,692 (La.App.2d Cir.12/20/02), .
State v. Jackson 87 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172 (La.2/21/01), ; State v. Hunter, 36,692 (La.App.
Eddie Ray Jackson v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 00-172 (La.2/21/01), this court considered an ex post facto challenge to the sex offender registration provisions.
Jackson v. State 102 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Olivieri v. State, 00-172 (La.2/21/01), , this court considered an ex post facto challenge to the sex offender registration provisions.
Smith v. State 84 So. 3d 487 La. 2012
Olivieri, 00-|0172 (La.2/21/01), , this court considered an ex post facto challenge to the sex offender registration provisions.
State v. Perkins 78 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Olivieri, v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated as follows: [I]n the absence of a statute of limitations, the State retains the right to prosecute for crimes indefinitely.
Martinez v. Tanner 79 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), , cert.
State v. Young 73 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), , cert.
State v. Golston 67 So. 3d 452 La. 2011
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), -50 , this Court held that retroactive application of “Megan’s Law” (La.
State v. Bishop 68 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172, 00-1767 (La.2/21/01), , cert.
State v. Mitchell 49 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172 (La.2/21/01), , 1 the Louisiana Supreme Court determined that La.
State v. Mire 44 So. 3d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01); , cert.
Brown v. LeBlanc 30 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Allemand 30 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Oli-vieri v. State, 00-0172, pp. 1-2 (La.2/21/01), -37 , cert.
State v. Schaller 15 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), -37 , cert.
State v. Simpkins 12 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Olivieri v. State, 2000-0172, p. 11 (La.2/21/01), , cert.
Tubbs v. Stalder 9 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson 4 So. 3d 926 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), ; but see State v. Mayeux, 01-3195 (La.6/21/02), (where the legislative intent and ameliorative nature of a new sentencing law caused the court to apply the new law effective at the time of the defendant’s *929 conviction instead of the old law effective at the time he committed the offense).
State v. Bedoya 998 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172, p. 2 (La.2/21/01), -37 , cert.
State v. Morris 996 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Olivieri v. State, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/21/01), ; State v. Hunter, 36,692 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Clarence Edmond La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Edmond 985 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Borden 986 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), -37 , cert, denied, 533 U.S. 936 , 121 S.Ct.
State v. Myers 981 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172, p. 2 (La.2/21/01), -37 , cert.
State of Louisiana v. E.P.C., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), cert.
State v. E.P.C. 980 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), , cert.
State v. BARBAY 985 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Olivieri v. State, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 15-16 (La.2/21/01), , cert.
Williams v. Creed 978 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), -44 , cert.
State v. Hyde 968 So. 2d 726 La. 2007
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172, pp. 15-16 (La.2/21/01), (adopting federal standard for determining ex post facto applications of the law, i.e., "whether the change alters the definition of criminal conduct or increases the penalty."); cf. Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 30-31 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. McKeehan 969 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Olivieri v. State, 00-0172 (La.2/21/01), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that if a law changes the definition of criminal conduct or increases the penalty for a particular crime applying it retroactively violates the state and federal constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto laws.
State v. Greene 951 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Olivieri v. State, 00-172 (La.2/21/01), , cert.
State v. Godbolt 950 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Olivieri v. State, XXXX-XXXX, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/21/01), , cert.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by