Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Kennedy, 803 So. 2d 916.

73 citing documents.

State v. Mutz 896 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
[5] See State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01), fn.
State v. Williams 893 So. 2d 7 La. 2004
State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01)
State v. Nguyen 888 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
art. 404(B)(1); State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01), ; State v. Dauzart, 02-1187, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Ellis 880 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.04/03/01), , appeal after remand, 02-214 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Charles Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
The Williams court found as follows: The transcript of the committee hearing reveals that Act 1130 was prompted primarily by two decisions of this Court, State v. McArthur, 97-2918 (La.10/20/98), and State v. Kennedy, 2000-1554 (La.4/3/01)
State v. Brown 874 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
The Williams court found as follows: The transcript of the committee hearing reveals that Act 1130 was prompted primarily by two decisions of this Court, State v. McArthur, 97-2918 (La.10/20/98), , and State v. Kennedy, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), .
State v. Morgan 863 So. 2d 520 La. 2004
On respondent's application for review, this Court remanded the case to the court of appeal "for consideration in light of State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01), ."
State v. Williams 862 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
(The enactment was in direct response to the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.04/03/01), .
State v. Olivieri 860 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
e v. Williams, 02-1030 (La.10/15/02), -987 , the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the transcript of the committee hearing of Act 1130 that enacted Article 412.2 and explained the purpose of the article as follows: Act 1130 was prompted primarily by two decisions of this Court, State v. McArthur, 97-2918 (La.10/20/98), , and State v. Kennedy, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), .
State v. Galliano 839 So. 2d 932 La. 2003
[1] NOTES [1] As to the requisite burden of proof, we noted in State v. Kennedy, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), , 920 n. 5 that Article 1104 of the Louisiana Code of Evidence was added in 1994 to provide that "the burden of proof in a shall be identical to the burden of proof required by Federal Rules of Evidence Article IV, Rule 404."
State v. Quiambao 833 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
In State v. Kennedy, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), , the supreme court ruled that when specific intent is not an element of the crime, evidence of other crimes or bad acts under La.
State v. Conner 833 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
art. 404B(1); State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01), .
State v. Williams 830 So. 2d 984 La. 2002
The transcript of the committee hearing reveals that Act 1130 was prompted primarily by two decisions of this Court, State v. McArthur, 97-2918 (La.10/20/98), , and State v. Kennedy, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), .
State v. Taylor 821 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
art. 404 B. He correctly argues that evidence of prior bad acts is generally inadmissible under art. 404 B. He specifically argues that State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01), , has greatly limited the admissibility of "lustful disposition" evidence to prior conduct involving the complaining witness, or to cases where it is relevant to prove specific intent, identity or plan.
State v. Morgan 830 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Defendant applied for a writ of certiorari to the Louisiana Supreme Court, which was granted, and the matter was remanded to this court “for consideration in light of State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01), .” State v. Morgan, 2001-0418 (La.1/25/02), .
State v. Smith 815 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
The recent ruling by the Louisiana Supreme Court, State v. Kennedy, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), , reviewed the admissibility of other sex crime evidence in the trial of a general intent crime, such as aggravated rape or forcible rape.
State v. Zornes 814 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
/21/01), , granted defendant's writ application in part and remanded the matter to this court, "for reconsideration of defendant's assignment of error number two, challenging the trial court's ruling which permitted evidence at trial of (defendant's) sexually assaultive behavior with another minor victim and member of his family, in light of State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.04/03/01), ."
State v. Morgan 806 So. 2d 662 La. 2002
This case is remanded to the Court of Appeal for reconsideration in light of State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01), .
State v. Maise 805 So. 2d 1141 La. 2002
The issue raised by the defendant regarding the admission of other crimes evidence in a case involving the rape of a minor was recently before this court in State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01), .
State v. Mills 806 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
In State v. Kennedy, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/01), , the defendant was charged with the rape of a child under the age of twelve.
State v. Temple 806 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01), [ 2001 La.
State v. Zornes 801 So. 2d 1082 La. 2001
This case is remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration of the defendant’s assign *1083 ment of error number two, challenging the trial court’s ruling which permitted evidence at trial of his sexually assaultive behavior with another minor victim and member of his family, in light of State v. Kennedy, 00-1554 (La.4/3/01), .
State v. Taylor 802 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Kennedy, 00-1554, (La.4/3/01), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by