Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Marcantel, 815 So. 2d 50.

190 citing documents.

State v. Caffrey 15 So. 3d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The requirement that the evidence be viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution requires the reviewing court to defer to “ ‘the actual trier of fact’s rational credibility calls, evidence weighing and inference drawing.’ ” State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Henry Leo Eaglin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
4/3/02), wherein the supreme court stated, “[w]here there is no physical evidence to link a defendant to the crime charged, the testimony of one witness, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a factual conclusion required for a verdict of guilty.” As such, the Defendant deduces that the testimony
State v. Eaglin 4 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In support of his argument, the Defendant refers to State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), , wherein the supreme court stated, “[w]here there is no physical evidence to link a defendant to the crime charged, the testimony of one witness, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a factual conclusion required for a verdict of guilty.” As such, the Defendant deduces that the testimony of
State v. Maxwell 8 So. 3d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Adams 993 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Watson 993 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 1/17/06), , 1076 citing State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ; Bailey , 04-85 at 5, 875 So.2d at 955 .
State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/02), ; (La.
State v. Shaw 987 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.4/3/02), ; (La.
State v. Oliphant 980 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Simmons 983 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Mathieu 980 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Carter 974 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Taylor 975 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
"The requirement that the evidence be viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution obliges the reviewing court to defer to `[t]he actual trier of fact's rational credibility calls, evidence weighing and inference drawing.'" State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Bowers 965 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Baker 962 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Traylor 961 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
See State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.04/03/02), .
State v. Dunbar 950 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 8 (La.4/3/02)
State v. Weatherspoon 948 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
See, State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), fn.
State v. Doussan 924 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ; Bailey, 04-85 at p. 5, 875 So.2d at 955.
State v. Clark 924 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ; Turner , 05-75 at pp. 12-13, 904 So.2d at 823 .
State v. Hooker 921 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ; Bailey , 04-85 at 5, 875 So.2d at 955 .
State of Louisiana v. Junior Ray Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Fontenot 918 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
See also State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Jefferson 922 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Mazique 919 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ; Bailey , 04-85 at p. 5, 875 So.2d at 955 .
State v. Wiley 914 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/3/02), ; State v. Updite, 38,423 (La.App.
State v. McGinnis 917 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), ; State ex rel.
State v. Stewart 909 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
As the Supreme Court noted in State v. Marcantel, XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), , 56: "[w]here there is no physical evidence to link a defendant to the crime charged, the testimony of one witness, if *641 believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a factual conclusion required for a verdict of guilty."
State v. Stone 904 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
[2] State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), ().
State v. Turner 904 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ; Bailey , 04-85 at 5, 875 So.2d at 955 .
State v. Williams 904 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ; Bailey , 04-85 at 5, 875 So.2d at 955 .
State v. Young 902 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
[2] State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Jones 902 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ; Bailey , 04-85 at 5, 875 So.2d at 955 .
State v. Carey 901 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ; Bailey , 04-85 at 5, 875 So.2d at 955 .
State v. Yrle 901 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ; Bailey , 04-85 at 5, 875 So.2d at 955 .
State v. Proctor 901 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, *482 p. 9 (La.4/3/02), ; Bailey , 04-85 at 5, 875 So.2d at 955 .
State v. Bean 899 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
See State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), -56 .
State of Louisiana v. Robert T. Dotson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. John R. Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02)
State v. Dotson 896 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Turner 896 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Hensley 900 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
See, State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), fn.
State v. Sosa 892 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
4/3/02), , (emphasis as found in the original).
State v. Nunnery 891 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
See also State v. Marcantel, 2000-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Phillips 891 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
See also State v. Marcantel, 2000-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), , in which the Supreme Court stated that “[w]here there is no physical evidence to link a defendant to the crime charged, the testimony of one witness, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient stopport for a factual conclusion required for a verdict of guilty.” 2000-1629, p. 9, 815 So.2d at 56 (emphasis add
State v. Johnson 887 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Jason M. Reeves La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02)
State v. Reeves 890 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Marcantel, 00-1629 (La.4/3/02), .
State v. Ingram 888 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Id.; State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 9 (La.4/3/02), .