Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.
Also decided on this docket: La., May 11, 2001 792 So. 2d 1
Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist., 798 So. 2d 951 (La. 2001).
Cited by
- Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist. 836 So. 2d 14 La. 2003
- Banks v. New Orleans Police Department 821 So. 2d 1292 La. 2002
- White v. Shop Rite 813 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist. 815 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
- Haynes v. Fence 805 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist. 780 So. 2d 1197
Opinion text
798 So.2d 951 (2001) Michael J. FONTENOT v. REDDELL VIDRINE WATER DISTRICT, et al. No. 2001-C-0752. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 26, 2001. Michael B. Miller, Crowley, Counsel for Applicant. Sammie M. Henry, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Respondent. PER CURIAM. [*] The judgment of the court of appeal is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, to render judgment anew after reconciling conflicting rulings in Fontenot v. Vidrine Water District, 00-762 (La.App. 3rd Cir.2/21/01), 780 So.2d 1197 and Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum, 01-0026 (La.App. 3rd Cir.7/25/01) ___ So.2d ___, 2001 WL 832975 , regarding the interpretation of La. R .S. 23:1201(F). We order the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, to decide this matter en banc in order to achieve uniformity within the circuit. NOTES [*] Retired Judge Robert L. Lobrano, assigned as Associate Justice Pro Tempore, participating in the decision.