DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coleman v. Deno, 813 So. 2d 303.

163 citing documents.

  • Pender v. Natchitoches Parish Hosp. 844 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    In Coleman v. Deno, 01-1517 (La.1/25/02); , the supreme court set out six factors for determining whether specific conduct by a qualified healthcare provider constitutes "malpractice" under the LMMA.
  • Scott v. Dauterive Hosp. Corp. 851 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    See also Coleman v. Deno, 01-1517, 01-1519, 01-1521 (La.1/25/02); .
  • Todd v. Angelloz 844 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Coleman v. Deno, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 17-18 (La.1/25/02), -16 , the court used the following factors in making its determination: (1) whether the particular wrong is `treatment related' or caused by a dereliction of professional skill, (2) whether the wrong requires expert medical evidence to determine whether the appropriate standard of care was breached, and (3) whethe
  • Richard v. Louisiana Extended Care Centers 835 So. 2d 460 La. 2003
    As we have previously held in Coleman v. Deno, 01-1517 (La.1/25/02), -316 , to be covered under the MMA, the negligent act must be related to medical treatment.
  • Hebert v. Chateau Living Center, LLC 836 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Coleman *493 v. Deno, 01-1517, p. 16 (La.1/25/02), .
  • Coleman v. Deno 832 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    40:1299.41 et seq "] Coleman v. Deno, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/25/02), .
  • Flood v. Pendleton Memorial Methodist Hosp. 823 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    17-18 (La.1/25/02), -316 .
  • In Re Triss 820 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Id; Coleman v. Deno, XXXX-XXXX, p. 20 (La.1/25/02), .
  • Harris v. Sternberg 819 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    In Coleman v. Deno, 01-1517, 01-1519, 01-1521 (La.1/25/02), , the Supreme Court reiterated the factors for determining whether certain conduct by a qualified health care provider constitutes "malpractice" as defined under the Act: (1) whether the particular wrong is "treatment related" or caused by a dereliction of professional skill, (2) whether the wrong requires expert medi
  • Pender v. Natchitoches Parish Hosp. 817 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Finally, and perhaps most importantly, our decision comports with Coleman v. Deno , XXXX-XXXX (La.1/25/02); , where our supreme court found that the appellate court erred in recognizing an intentional tort of "patient dumping" against the defendant-doctor for improper transfer of the patient.
  • Satterwhite v. Reilly 817 So. 2d 407 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    40:1299.41 A; see also, Coleman v. Deno, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/25/02), .
  • Williams v. Metro Home Health Care Agency, Inc. 817 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    found that failure to attend a patient when the circumstances demonstrate the serious consequences of this failure, and failure of an on-call physician to respond to an emergency when he knows or should know that his presence is necessary are also examples of obvious negligence which require no expert testimony to demonstrate the physician's fault See also Coleman v. Deno, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/25/02), ; Dean v. Ochsner Medical Foundation *1229 Hosp.
  • Netherland v. Ethicon, Inc. 813 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Coleman v. Deno, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/25/02), .