Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Campo v. Correa, 828 So. 2d 502.

316 citing documents.

  • Belton v. Baehr 34 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Sperandeo v. OSABAS 33 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, p. 7 (La.6/21/02), .
  • In Re Medical Review Panel Proceedings of Berry 30 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    “Prescription commences when a plaintiff obtains actual or constructive knowledge of facts indicating to a reasonable person that he or she is the victim of a tort.” Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, pp. 11-12 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Marino v. Tenet Healthsystem Medical Center, Inc. 26 So. 3d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    9:5628 A. Justice Knoll, writing for a unanimous Supreme Court, set out the basic test in Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, p. 12 (La.6/21/02), , 510-511: | ¿Prescription commences when a plaintiff obtains actual or constructive knowledge of facts indicating to a reasonable person that he or she is a victim of a tort ...
  • Williams v. Shaw Group, Inc. 21 So. 3d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, p. 7 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Warren v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 21 So. 3d 186 La. 2009
    en in obiter dicta in cases where the three-year provision did not come into play and the discussion of which was not necessary to the resolution of the issues, *213 Perritt v. Dona, 02-2601, p. 15 (La.7/2/03), (medical malpractice case involving the propounding of interrogatories and exceptions of vagueness or no cause of action); Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, pp. 8-10 (La.6/21/02), -09 (medical malpractice claim brought well within three years from the date of the act of malpractice; directly quot
  • Kroger Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons, Inc. 13 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), ; Alexander, supra .
  • Dave Beach v. Cna La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Beach v. Continental Casualty Co. 11 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    (quoting Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, pp. 11-12 (La.6/21/02), ).
  • Medical Review Panel Proceeding of Williams v. Lewis 17 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, pp. 11-12 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Heirs of Jackson v. O'Donovan 12 So. 3d 435 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Carter v. Haygood, 2004-0646, p. 8-9 (La.1/19/05), ; Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707, p. 7 (La.6/21/07), .
  • Benoit v. Wooderson 7 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, pp. 11-12 (La.6/21/02), -511 (citations omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court said: Prescription commences when a plaintiff obtains actual or constructive knowledge of facts indicating to a reasonable person that he or she is the victim of a tort.
  • Natasha Simona A. Benoit v. James Michael Wooderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, pp. 11-12 (La.6/21/02), -511 (citations omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court said: Prescription commences when a plaintiff obtains actual or constructive knowledge of facts indicating to a reasonable person that he or she is the victim of a tort.
  • Knox v. West Baton Rouge Credit, Inc. 9 So. 3d 1020 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Ellison, 960 So.2d at 157 ; Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), -511 ; Dau-zat, 710 So.2d at 1090-1091; Kambitsis v. Sehwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc., 95-478 (La.App.
  • Needom v. Robein 7 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707, pp. 7-9 (La.6/21/02), -09 , the Court interpreted similar language found in La.
  • Gallant Investments, Ltd. v. Illinois Central Railroad 7 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, p. 12 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Kroger Co. v. L.G. Barcus & Sons, Inc. 2 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), ; Alexander, supra.
  • Mims Ex Rel. Unopened Succession of Mims v. Lifecare Hospitals, LLC 1 So. 3d 660 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Holmes v. LSU/EA Conway Medical Center 997 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • McGuire v. Mosley Rogers Title Co., LLC 997 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Borel v. Young 989 So. 2d 42 La. 2008
    of Ethics v. Ourso, 02-1978, p. 4 (La.4/9/03), ; Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, p. 8 (La.6/21/02), ; Boutte v. Jefferson Parish Hosp.
  • Ferguson v. Sugar 988 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707, p. 9 (La.6/21/02)
  • Wilburn v. SUMMIT HOSPITAL 986 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    6/21/02), ; Borel v. Young, 07-0419 (La.
  • Assaleh v. Sherwood Forest Country Club Inc. 991 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707, p. 7 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Jambon v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 982 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    [7] Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Parish of St. Charles v. Rh Creager, Inc. 975 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    [5] Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 974 So. 2d 1266 La. 2008
    See generally, Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), (interpreting the discovery rule as contained in the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act); Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), (interpreting the discovery rule as contained in the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act).
  • Little v. Pou 975 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    9:2794 C; Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), ; Fluck v. Coffman, 37,739 (La.App.2d Cir.12/12/03), .
  • Baldini v. East Jefferson General Hosp. 976 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    1 Cir. 3/28/03), ; Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, p. 7 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Boes Iron Works LLC v. Galatas 974 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Campo v. Correct, 2001-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Randy Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Fontenot v. PATTERSON INS. 972 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    See also Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • DOMINION EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION v. Waters 972 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, 04-0647, 04-0684, p. 10 (La.1/20/05), , citing Campo v. Correa, 01-2702, p. 11 (La.6/21/02), .
  • OIL INS. LTD. v. Dow Chemical Co. 977 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    See Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94), ; -29 (La.1992), and compare Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707 pp. 6-9 (La.6/21/02), -09 (burden remains on exceptor if contra non valentem principle codified into the applicable prescriptive codal article or statute).
  • Bertoniere v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 972 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02)
  • Bertoniere v. JEFFERSON PARISH HOSP. 972 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02)
  • Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 964 So. 2d 1015 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, p. 12 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Holley v. TOTAL REHAB OF BATON ROUGE, LLC 970 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    The supreme court discussed the application of this statute in Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), , 510-11: Prescription commences when a plaintiff obtains actual or constructive knowledge of facts indicating to a reasonable person that he or she is the victim of a tort.
  • Edwards v. Alexander 960 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Ellison v. Ellison 960 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707, p. 12 (La.6/21/02), -11 ; Kambitsis v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc., 95-478, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • Borel v. Young 947 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Minos Borel, Sr. v. Lafayette General Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Bureaus Investment Group 2, LLC v. Howard 947 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707, p. 7 (La.6/21/02), ; Waguespack v. Judge, 04-137, p. 4 (La.App.
  • Dave Neal v. Town of Welsh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Neal v. TOWN OF WELSH 942 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • London Towne Condo. Ass'n v. LONDON TOWNE 939 So. 2d 1227 La. 2006
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Ball v. CHARTER FOREST BEHAV. HEALTH SYSTEM 938 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    9:2794 C; Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707 (La.6/21/02), ; Fluck v. Coffman, 37,739 (La.App.
  • Young v. Young 931 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, p. 10 (La.2002), (citing Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
  • Connie Durant Young v. Stephen Hardy Young La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    “Where one or more trial court legal errors interdict the fact finding process, the manifest error standard is no longer applicable, and, if the record is otherwise complete, the reviewing court should make its own independent de novo review and assessment of the record.” Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, p. 10 (La.2002), (citing Ferrell v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.