2001-C-3365
Precedential
Processed
Hansel v. Hansel
Also decided on this docket: La., March 8, 2002 811 So. 2d 880
Hansel v. Hansel, 811 So. 2d 880 (La. 2002).
Cited by
- Hulshoff v. Hulshoff 81 So. 3d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Natalie Jeanne Edmonds Lord v. Brett Kenneth Lord La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Lord v. Lord 22 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- CHALMETTE AMUSEMENT CO., INC. v. Alphonso 983 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- Saacks v. Saacks 942 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
- Shirley v. Frazier 914 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- Cain v. Cain 903 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- Peacock v. Peacock 903 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- Smith v. State 899 So. 2d 516 La. 2005
- Sequeira v. Sequeira 888 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
- City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Broussard 834 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- Reeves v. Reeves 823 So. 2d 1023 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Opinion text
811 So.2d 880 (2002) Stephen Arthur HANSEL v. Sarah Holyfield Hansel w/o Stephen A. HANSEL. No. 2001-C-3365. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 8, 2002. *881 Denied. VICTORY, J., would grant the writ.